DFSIX vs. FLCPX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DFSIX (DFA U.S. Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio) and FLCPX (Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, DFSIX returned 15.19%/yr vs 15.80%/yr for FLCPX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DFSIX charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for FLCPX.

Performance

DFSIX vs. FLCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA U.S. Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio (DFSIX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFSIX achieves a 6.55% return, which is significantly lower than FLCPX's 9.81% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DFSIX having a 15.19% annualized return and FLCPX not far ahead at 15.80%.

DFSIX

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 0.43%
• YTD: 6.55%
• 6M: 5.28%
• 1Y: 22.09%
• 3Y*: 19.56%
• 5Y*: 11.76%
• 10Y*: 15.19%

FLCPX

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 0.10%
• YTD: 9.81%
• 6M: 8.81%
• 1Y: 25.50%
• 3Y*: 21.42%
• 5Y*: 13.62%
• 10Y*: 15.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFSIX vs. FLCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DFSIX DFA U.S. Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio	6.55%	15.92%	23.19%	25.70%	-17.85%	27.38%	21.25%	32.52%	-6.72%	20.80%
FLCPX Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund	9.81%	17.84%	25.08%	26.25%	-18.06%	28.61%	18.24%	31.59%	-4.38%	21.74%

Correlation

The correlation between DFSIX and FLCPX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2016	0.96

The correlation between DFSIX and FLCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DFSIX vs. FLCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFSIX

DFSIX Risk / Return Rank: 44
DFSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
DFSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
DFSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
DFSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
DFSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

FLCPX

FLCPX Risk / Return Rank: 66
FLCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FLCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
FLCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
FLCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
FLCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFSIX vs. FLCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio (DFSIX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFSIX	FLCPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	2.16	-0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.54	2.92	-0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.39	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.27	3.03	-0.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.74	13.66	-3.92

DFSIX vs. FLCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the FLCPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFSIX and FLCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DFSIX vs. FLCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSIX drawdown since its inception was -53.77%, which is greater than FLCPX's maximum drawdown of -33.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSIX and FLCPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFSIX	FLCPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.77%	-33.87%	-19.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.36%	-8.89%	-1.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.13%	-18.76%	-1.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.16%	-24.40%	-0.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.68%	-33.87%	-1.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.24%	-1.71%	+0.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.88%	-4.17%	-2.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.40%	1.97%	+0.43%

Volatility

DFSIX vs. FLCPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA U.S. Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio (DFSIX) is 4.32%, while Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX) has a volatility of 4.67%. This indicates that DFSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFSIX	FLCPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.32%	4.67%	-0.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.35%	9.90%	+0.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.11%	12.51%	+0.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.64%	17.16%	+0.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.31%	18.21%	+0.10%

DFSIX vs. FLCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSIX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCPX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DFSIX vs. FLCPX - Dividend Comparison

DFSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, more than FLCPX's 0.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFSIX DFA U.S. Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio	0.84%	0.88%	0.99%	1.21%	1.35%	2.13%	1.19%	2.02%	2.31%	1.92%	1.85%	2.13%
FLCPX Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund	0.51%	0.56%	6.11%	7.05%	11.23%	10.38%	3.93%	1.74%	2.18%	1.57%	0.76%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFSIX and FLCPX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, DFSIX and FLCPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DFSIX or FLCPX?

FLCPX has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to DFSIX (4.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSIX dropped -53.77% vs FLCPX's -33.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.