PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFSIX vs. DFLVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFSIX vs. DFLVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA U.S. Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio (DFSIX) and DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio (DFLVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFSIX achieves a 8.57% return, which is significantly lower than DFLVX's 19.19% return. Over the past 10 years, DFSIX has outperformed DFLVX with an annualized return of 14.71%, while DFLVX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.04% annualized return.


DFSIX

1D
0.50%
1M
0.25%
6M
6.44%
YTD
8.57%
1Y
19.99%
3Y*
17.77%
5Y*
11.44%
10Y*
14.71%
ALL TIME*
11.80%

DFLVX

1D
0.30%
1M
2.21%
6M
12.84%
YTD
19.19%
1Y
33.32%
3Y*
17.36%
5Y*
12.20%
10Y*
12.04%
ALL TIME*
10.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DFSIX vs. DFLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFSIX
DFA U.S. Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio
8.57%15.92%23.19%25.70%-17.85%27.38%21.25%32.52%-6.72%20.80%
DFLVX
DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio
19.19%16.36%12.76%11.52%-5.81%30.40%-0.58%25.46%-11.68%18.50%

Correlation

The correlation between DFSIX and DFLVX is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2008

0.92

The correlation between DFSIX and DFLVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFSIX vs. DFLVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFSIX
DFSIX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
DFSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

DFLVX
DFLVX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
DFLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DFLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFSIX vs. DFLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio (DFSIX) and DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio (DFLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFSIXDFLVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.51

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

5.47

-3.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.48

20.84

-13.36

DFSIX vs. DFLVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the DFLVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFSIX and DFLVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFSIX vs. DFLVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSIX drawdown since its inception was -53.77%, smaller than the maximum DFLVX drawdown of -65.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSIX and DFLVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFSIXDFLVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.77%

-65.65%

+11.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.36%

-5.86%

-4.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.13%

-16.64%

-3.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.16%

-19.83%

-5.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.68%

-41.79%

+6.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.15%

-0.40%

-0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.84%

-8.44%

+1.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.43%

1.57%

+0.86%

Volatility

DFSIX vs. DFLVX - Volatility Comparison

DFA U.S. Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio (DFSIX) has a higher volatility of 3.22% compared to DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio (DFLVX) at 2.52%. This indicates that DFSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFLVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFSIXDFLVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.22%

2.52%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.34%

8.20%

+2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.20%

11.21%

+1.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.61%

15.77%

+1.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.24%

18.29%

-0.05%

DFSIX vs. DFLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSIX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than DFLVX's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFSIX vs. DFLVX - Dividend Comparison

DFSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than DFLVX's 1.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFLVX
DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio
1.43%1.71%1.87%3.65%4.56%5.90%1.97%4.04%7.83%6.06%3.77%6.52%
DFSIX
DFA U.S. Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio
0.84%0.88%0.99%1.21%1.35%2.13%1.19%2.02%2.31%1.92%1.85%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFSIX and DFLVX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFSIX has higher volatility (3.22%) compared to DFLVX (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSIX dropped -53.77% vs DFLVX's -65.65%.

DFLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFSIX and DFLVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer