DFSD vs. DFGP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DFSD (Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF) and DFGP (Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFSD is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Dimensional, while DFGP is a Global Bonds fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DFSD returned 3.30% vs 4.00% for DFGP. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFSD charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for DFGP.

Performance

DFSD vs. DFGP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF (DFSD) and Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF (DFGP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFSD achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly lower than DFGP's 0.87% return.

DFSD

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: -0.17%
• YTD: 0.22%
• 6M: 0.39%
• 1Y: 3.30%
• 3Y*: 5.16%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DFGP

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 0.87%
• 6M: 1.00%
• 1Y: 4.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFSD vs. DFGP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DFSD Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF	0.22%	6.59%	4.60%	2.30%
DFGP Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF	0.87%	5.89%	3.71%	6.23%

Correlation

The correlation between DFSD and DFGP is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2023	0.76

The correlation between DFSD and DFGP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DFSD vs. DFGP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFSD

DFSD Risk / Return Rank: 52
DFSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
DFSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
DFSD Omega Ratio Rank: 54
DFSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
DFSD Martin Ratio Rank: 52

DFGP

DFGP Risk / Return Rank: 28
DFGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
DFGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
DFGP Omega Ratio Rank: 27
DFGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
DFGP Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFSD vs. DFGP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF (DFSD) and Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF (DFGP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFSD	DFGP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	0.99	+0.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.48	1.44	+1.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.18	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.26	1.24	+1.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.48	4.15	+4.33

DFSD vs. DFGP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFSD Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is higher than the DFGP Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFSD and DFGP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DFSD vs. DFGP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSD drawdown since its inception was -8.45%, which is greater than DFGP's maximum drawdown of -3.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSD and DFGP.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFSD	DFGP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.45%	-3.24%	-5.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.47%	-3.24%	+1.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.83%	-1.18%	+0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.05%	-0.78%	-1.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.39%	0.97%	-0.58%

Volatility

DFSD vs. DFGP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF (DFSD) is 0.78%, while Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF (DFGP) has a volatility of 1.39%. This indicates that DFSD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFGP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFSD	DFGP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.78%	1.39%	-0.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.59%	3.42%	-1.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.98%	4.06%	-2.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.78%	4.67%	-1.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.78%	4.67%	-1.89%

DFSD vs. DFGP - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSD has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than DFGP's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DFSD vs. DFGP - Dividend Comparison

DFSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, more than DFGP's 3.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DFGP Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF	3.65%	3.45%	4.51%	0.62%	0.00%	0.00%
DFSD Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF	3.99%	4.12%	4.81%	3.89%	2.12%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFSD and DFGP in my portfolio?

DFSD and DFGP have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFSD or DFGP?

DFGP has higher volatility (1.39%) compared to DFSD (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSD dropped -8.45% vs DFGP's -3.24%.

Which ETF is better, DFSD or DFGP?

On 1-year performance, DFGP leads with 4.00% vs 3.30% for DFSD. On fees, DFSD is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, DFSD has been the lower-risk option at 0.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFSD or DFGP?

Over the 1-year period, DFGP has performed better with a 4.00% return vs 3.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFSD or DFGP?

DFSD is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for DFGP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFSD or DFGP?

DFSD has the higher dividend yield at 3.99%, compared with 3.65% for DFGP.

What is the main difference between DFSD and DFGP?

DFSD is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while DFGP is Global Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for DFSD and 0.22% for DFGP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.