PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFSD vs. DDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFSD vs. DDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF (DFSD) and Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFSD achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly lower than DDV's 2.35% return.


DFSD

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.23%
6M
0.35%
YTD
0.79%
1Y
2.80%
3Y*
5.18%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.47%

DDV

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.06%
6M
1.60%
YTD
2.35%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$74.78K$50.90K$102.48K
$24.91M$26.60M$25.77M

DFSD vs. DDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DFSD and DDV is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025

0.66

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFSD vs. DDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFSD
DFSD Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
DFSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSD Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSD Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

DDV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFSD vs. DDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF (DFSD) and Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFSDDDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.33

DFSD vs. DDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFSD vs. DDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSD drawdown since its inception was -8.45%, which is greater than DDV's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSD and DDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFSDDDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.45%

-1.92%

-6.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-0.29%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.01%

-0.34%

-1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

Volatility

DFSD vs. DDV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFSDDDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94%

2.64%

-0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.75%

2.64%

+0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.75%

2.64%

+0.11%

DFSD vs. DDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSD has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than DDV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFSD vs. DDV - Dividend Comparison

DFSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than DDV's 1.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DDV
Defined Duration 5 ETF
1.62%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DFSD
Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF
4.59%4.12%4.81%3.89%2.12%0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFSD and DDV have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DFSD is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DFSD is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for DDV.

DFSD has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 1.62% for DDV.

DFSD is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while DDV is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Discipline Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for DFSD and 0.25% for DDV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFSD and DDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer