PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFSD vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFSD vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF (DFSD) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFSD achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 76.48% return.


DFSD

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.23%
6M
0.35%
YTD
0.79%
1Y
2.80%
3Y*
5.18%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.47%

DBO

1D
1.56%
1M
24.59%
6M
53.46%
YTD
76.48%
1Y
60.30%
3Y*
14.86%
5Y*
13.46%
10Y*
12.59%
ALL TIME*
0.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.01M$10.23M$13.95M
$24.91M$26.60M$25.77M

DFSD vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DFSD
Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF
0.79%6.59%4.60%6.09%-5.87%-0.05%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
76.48%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%13.04%-8.26%

Correlation

The correlation between DFSD and DBO is -0.44, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2021

-0.18

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between DFSD and DBO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.18 to -0.44, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFSD vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFSD
DFSD Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
DFSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSD Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSD Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFSD vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF (DFSD) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFSDDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.25

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

2.01

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.33

6.09

+2.24

DFSD vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFSD Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFSD and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFSD vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSD drawdown since its inception was -8.45%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSD and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFSDDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.45%

-90.18%

+81.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.47%

-27.73%

+26.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.47%

-28.20%

+26.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-53.56%

+53.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.01%

-62.20%

+60.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

9.96%

-9.56%

Volatility

DFSD vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF (DFSD) is 0.52%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 17.75%. This indicates that DFSD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFSDDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.52%

17.75%

-17.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.59%

33.77%

-32.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94%

38.53%

-36.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.75%

33.35%

-30.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.75%

32.20%

-29.45%

DFSD vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSD has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFSD vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

DFSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than DBO's 1.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
1.99%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%
DFSD
Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF
4.59%4.12%4.81%3.89%2.12%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFSD and DBO have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (17.75%) compared to DFSD (0.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSD dropped -8.45% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 3-year performance, DBO leads with 14.86% vs 5.18% for DFSD. On fees, DFSD is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, DFSD has been the lower-risk option at 0.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DBO has performed better with a 14.86% return vs 5.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFSD is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

DFSD has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 1.99% for DBO.

DFSD is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for DFSD and 0.78% for DBO.

DFSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFSD and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer