DFSD vs. BND
DFSD (Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF) and BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFSD is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Dimensional, while BND is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. DFSD is actively managed, while BND is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFSD returned 5.31%/yr vs 3.92%/yr for BND. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFSD charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BND.
Performance
DFSD vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFSD achieves a 0.67% return, which is significantly higher than BND's 0.38% return.
DFSD
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.67%
- 6M
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- 3.88%
- 3Y*
- 5.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BND
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 0.38%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 4.37%
- 3Y*
- 3.92%
- 5Y*
- 0.04%
- 10Y*
- 1.55%
DFSD vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSD Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF | 0.67% | 6.59% | 4.60% | 6.09% | -5.87% | -0.05% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 0.38% | 7.08% | 1.38% | 5.65% | -13.11% | 0.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFSD and BND is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2021 | 0.79 |
The correlation between DFSD and BND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFSD vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank
DFSD
BND
DFSD vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF (DFSD) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFSD | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.21 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 1.64 | +1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.08 | 4.69 | +5.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFSD vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFSD drawdown since its inception was -8.45%, smaller than the maximum BND drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSD and BND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFSD | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.45% | -18.58% | +10.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.47% | -2.68% | +1.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.47% | -5.92% | +4.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -2.26% | +1.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.05% | -3.06% | +1.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.39% | 0.93% | -0.54% |
Volatility
DFSD vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF (DFSD) is 0.64%, while Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) has a volatility of 1.08%. This indicates that DFSD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFSD | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.64% | 1.08% | -0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.53% | 2.77% | -1.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93% | 3.74% | -1.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.77% | 6.03% | -3.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.77% | 5.54% | -2.77% |
DFSD vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFSD has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFSD vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
DFSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, which matches BND's 3.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.96% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
DFSD Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF | 3.97% | 4.12% | 4.81% | 3.89% | 2.12% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFSD and BND have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BND has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to DFSD (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSD dropped -8.45% vs BND's -18.58%.
On 3-year performance, DFSD leads with 5.31% vs 3.92% for BND. On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, DFSD has been the lower-risk option at 0.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFSD has performed better with a 5.31% return vs 3.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for DFSD.
DFSD and BND have nearly identical dividend yields, around 3.97%.
DFSD is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while BND is Total Bond Market. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for DFSD and 0.03% for BND.
DFSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFSD and BND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer