PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFSCX vs. TSCSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFSCX vs. TSCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio (DFSCX) and Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S (TSCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFSCX achieves a 16.94% return, which is significantly higher than TSCSX's 12.98% return. Over the past 10 years, DFSCX has underperformed TSCSX with an annualized return of 11.20%, while TSCSX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.62% annualized return.


DFSCX

1D
0.66%
1M
2.89%
YTD
16.94%
6M
16.37%
1Y
35.45%
3Y*
17.74%
5Y*
9.05%
10Y*
11.20%

TSCSX

1D
1.22%
1M
4.74%
YTD
12.98%
6M
11.77%
1Y
24.87%
3Y*
13.11%
5Y*
6.13%
10Y*
12.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFSCX vs. TSCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFSCX
DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio
16.94%9.65%11.43%17.93%-12.49%33.70%6.61%20.68%-11.60%10.92%
TSCSX
Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S
12.98%2.36%12.73%12.47%-10.94%24.22%22.87%27.92%-10.52%21.22%

Correlation

The correlation between DFSCX and TSCSX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 1997

0.94

The correlation between DFSCX and TSCSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFSCX vs. TSCSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFSCX
DFSCX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DFSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

TSCSX
TSCSX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TSCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
TSCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFSCX vs. TSCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio (DFSCX) and Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S (TSCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFSCXTSCSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.27

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.65

2.34

+2.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.95

7.85

+7.11

DFSCX vs. TSCSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFSCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the TSCSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFSCX and TSCSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFSCXTSCSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

1.57

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.28

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.57

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.41

+0.19

Drawdowns

DFSCX vs. TSCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSCX drawdown since its inception was -63.07%, which is greater than TSCSX's maximum drawdown of -56.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSCX and TSCSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFSCXTSCSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.07%

-56.66%

-6.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.17%

-11.53%

+3.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.01%

-26.84%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.01%

-27.04%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.88%

-41.63%

-5.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.91%

-10.25%

+0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

3.43%

-0.90%

Volatility

DFSCX vs. TSCSX - Volatility Comparison

DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio (DFSCX) and Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S (TSCSX) have volatilities of 4.48% and 4.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFSCXTSCSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.48%

4.44%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.59%

12.33%

-0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.57%

17.20%

+0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.01%

21.66%

-0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.64%

22.13%

+0.51%

DFSCX vs. TSCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSCX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than TSCSX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFSCX vs. TSCSX - Dividend Comparison

DFSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than TSCSX's 2.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFSCX
DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio
0.82%1.03%0.97%2.48%5.16%10.77%0.87%2.80%5.50%5.05%0.90%6.33%
TSCSX
Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S
2.09%2.36%3.18%0.46%9.60%11.33%1.60%8.72%15.00%6.68%4.19%8.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, DFSCX and TSCSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DFSCX has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to TSCSX (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSCX dropped -63.07% vs TSCSX's -56.66%.

DFSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFSCX and TSCSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer