DFSCX vs. IVV
DFSCX (DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both funds - DFSCX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Dimensional, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, DFSCX returned 11.53%/yr vs 15.47%/yr for IVV. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFSCX charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
DFSCX vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFSCX achieves a 19.26% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 9.08% return. Over the past 10 years, DFSCX has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 11.53%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.47% annualized return.
DFSCX
- 1D
- 2.35%
- 1M
- 6.42%
- YTD
- 19.26%
- 6M
- 16.19%
- 1Y
- 38.65%
- 3Y*
- 17.49%
- 5Y*
- 9.29%
- 10Y*
- 11.53%
IVV
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -0.85%
- YTD
- 9.08%
- 6M
- 9.43%
- 1Y
- 25.77%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 13.42%
- 10Y*
- 15.47%
DFSCX vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSCX DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio | 19.26% | 9.65% | 11.43% | 17.93% | -12.49% | 33.70% | 6.61% | 20.68% | -11.60% | 10.92% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 9.08% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFSCX and IVV is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2000 | 0.81 |
The correlation between DFSCX and IVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFSCX vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
DFSCX
IVV
DFSCX vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio (DFSCX) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFSCX | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.36 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.37 | 2.76 | +1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.12 | 12.43 | +1.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFSCX vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFSCX drawdown since its inception was -63.07%, which is greater than IVV's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSCX and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFSCX | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.07% | -55.25% | -7.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.17% | -8.89% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.01% | -18.75% | -8.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.01% | -24.53% | -2.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.88% | -33.90% | -12.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.35% | +2.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.90% | -10.77% | +0.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 1.97% | +0.56% |
Volatility
DFSCX vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio (DFSCX) has a higher volatility of 5.02% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 4.37%. This indicates that DFSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFSCX | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.02% | 4.37% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.99% | 9.59% | +2.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.79% | 12.28% | +5.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.05% | 16.95% | +4.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.65% | 18.08% | +4.57% |
DFSCX vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFSCX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFSCX vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
DFSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than IVV's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSCX DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio | 0.80% | 1.03% | 0.97% | 2.48% | 5.16% | 10.77% | 0.87% | 2.80% | 5.50% | 5.05% | 0.90% | 6.33% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.08% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFSCX and IVV have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFSCX has higher volatility (5.02%) compared to IVV (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSCX dropped -63.07% vs IVV's -55.25%.
DFSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFSCX and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer