DFEN.DE vs. CNX1.L
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A (DFEN.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L).
DFEN.DE and CNX1.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DFEN.DE is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MarketVector Global Defense Industry. It was launched on Mar 31, 2023. CNX1.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010. Both DFEN.DE and CNX1.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DFEN.DE or CNX1.L.
Key characteristics
| DFEN.DE | CNX1.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 67.06% | 23.88% |
| 1Y Return | 67.06% | 30.62% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.98 | 1.90 |
| Sortino Ratio | 5.19 | 2.58 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.68 | 1.34 |
| Calmar Ratio | 8.74 | 2.46 |
| Martin Ratio | 38.03 | 7.42 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.71% | 4.05% |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.30% | 15.86% |
| Max Drawdown | -7.47% | -27.56% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFEN.DE and CNX1.L is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
DFEN.DE vs. CNX1.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, DFEN.DE achieves a 67.06% return, which is significantly higher than CNX1.L's 23.88% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFEN.DE vs. CNX1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFEN.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than CNX1.L's 0.36% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DFEN.DE vs. CNX1.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A (DFEN.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DFEN.DE vs. CNX1.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither DFEN.DE nor CNX1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
DFEN.DE vs. CNX1.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFEN.DE drawdown since its inception was -7.47%, smaller than the maximum CNX1.L drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFEN.DE and CNX1.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DFEN.DE vs. CNX1.L - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A (DFEN.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.21% compared to iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L) at 4.47%. This indicates that DFEN.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNX1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.