PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFNG.L vs. WENS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFNG.L vs. WENS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP (DFNG.L) and iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFNG.L achieves a 3.11% return, which is significantly lower than WENS.L's 31.95% return.


DFNG.L

1D
-1.51%
1M
-3.80%
YTD
3.11%
6M
7.91%
1Y
16.52%
3Y*
39.39%
5Y*
10Y*

WENS.L

1D
2.03%
1M
0.99%
YTD
31.95%
6M
27.20%
1Y
42.36%
3Y*
14.24%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFNG.L vs. WENS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DFNG.L
VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP
3.11%56.54%46.20%22.89%
WENS.L
iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
31.95%3.24%2.09%1.08%

Correlation

The correlation between DFNG.L and WENS.L is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2023

0.21

The correlation between DFNG.L and WENS.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFNG.L vs. WENS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFNG.L
DFNG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
DFNG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

WENS.L
WENS.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
WENS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WENS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
WENS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
WENS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
WENS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFNG.L vs. WENS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP (DFNG.L) and iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFNG.LWENS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.36

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

2.88

-1.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.23

9.35

-7.13

DFNG.L vs. WENS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFNG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the WENS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFNG.L and WENS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFNG.LWENS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

1.98

-1.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.97

0.60

+1.37

Drawdowns

DFNG.L vs. WENS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFNG.L drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, smaller than the maximum WENS.L drawdown of -22.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFNG.L and WENS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFNG.LWENS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.38%

-22.49%

+4.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.38%

-14.63%

-3.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.38%

-22.49%

+4.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.77%

-7.22%

-8.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.11%

-9.15%

+6.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.40%

4.52%

+2.88%

Volatility

DFNG.L vs. WENS.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP (DFNG.L) and iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L) have volatilities of 7.86% and 8.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFNG.LWENS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.86%

8.03%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.80%

18.21%

+0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.20%

21.39%

+2.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.40%

21.50%

-1.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.40%

21.50%

-1.10%

DFNG.L vs. WENS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFNG.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than WENS.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFNG.L vs. WENS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither DFNG.L nor WENS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DFNG.L
VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WENS.L
iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.00%0.00%1.75%3.61%1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFNG.L and WENS.L have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WENS.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WENS.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for DFNG.L.

DFNG.L is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while WENS.L is Energy Equities. DFNG.L tracks MarketVector Global Defense Industry index, while WENS.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for DFNG.L and 0.25% for WENS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFNG.L and WENS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer