PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFNG.L vs. AVSG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFNG.L vs. AVSG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP (DFNG.L) and Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF USD Acc (AVSG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DFNG.L is traded in GBP, while AVSG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AVSG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFNG.L achieves a 3.11% return, which is significantly lower than AVSG.L's 17.58% return.


DFNG.L

1D
-1.51%
1M
-3.80%
YTD
3.11%
6M
7.91%
1Y
16.52%
3Y*
39.39%
5Y*
10Y*

AVSG.L

1D
-0.14%
1M
3.68%
YTD
17.58%
6M
17.39%
1Y
38.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFNG.L vs. AVSG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DFNG.L
VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP
3.11%56.54%-2.65%
AVSG.L
Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF USD Acc
17.58%4.18%-3.04%

Correlation

The correlation between DFNG.L and AVSG.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2024

0.29

The correlation between DFNG.L and AVSG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFNG.L vs. AVSG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFNG.L
DFNG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
DFNG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

AVSG.L
AVSG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
AVSG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVSG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVSG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
AVSG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVSG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFNG.L vs. AVSG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP (DFNG.L) and Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF USD Acc (AVSG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFNG.LAVSG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.46

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

5.94

-5.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.23

21.05

-18.82

DFNG.L vs. AVSG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFNG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the AVSG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFNG.L and AVSG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFNG.LAVSG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

2.66

-1.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.97

0.69

+1.27

Drawdowns

DFNG.L vs. AVSG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFNG.L drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, smaller than the maximum AVSG.L drawdown of -25.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFNG.L and AVSG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFNG.LAVSG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.38%

-25.25%

+6.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.38%

-6.51%

-11.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.77%

-0.70%

-15.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.11%

-7.70%

+4.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.40%

1.84%

+5.56%

Volatility

DFNG.L vs. AVSG.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP (DFNG.L) has a higher volatility of 7.86% compared to Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF USD Acc (AVSG.L) at 3.63%. This indicates that DFNG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVSG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFNG.LAVSG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.86%

3.63%

+4.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.80%

10.49%

+8.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.20%

14.60%

+9.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.40%

17.71%

+2.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.40%

17.71%

+2.69%

DFNG.L vs. AVSG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFNG.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than AVSG.L's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFNG.L vs. AVSG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither DFNG.L nor AVSG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DFNG.L and AVSG.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AVSG.L is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AVSG.L is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for DFNG.L.

DFNG.L is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while AVSG.L is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for DFNG.L and 0.39% for AVSG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFNG.L and AVSG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer