DFLVX vs. DCARX
DFLVX (DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio) and DCARX (DFA California Municipal Real Return Portfolio) are both mutual funds - DFLVX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Dimensional, while DCARX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Dimensional. Over the past 5 years, DFLVX returned 11.94%/yr vs 2.51%/yr for DCARX. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFLVX charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for DCARX.
Performance
DFLVX vs. DCARX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFLVX achieves a 16.63% return, which is significantly higher than DCARX's 1.84% return.
DFLVX
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- 2.72%
- YTD
- 16.63%
- 6M
- 15.85%
- 1Y
- 32.08%
- 3Y*
- 19.24%
- 5Y*
- 11.94%
- 10Y*
- 12.36%
DCARX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- 1.84%
- 6M
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 2.99%
- 3Y*
- 3.08%
- 5Y*
- 2.51%
- 10Y*
- —
DFLVX vs. DCARX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFLVX DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio | 16.63% | 16.36% | 12.76% | 11.52% | -5.81% | 30.40% | -0.58% | 25.46% | -11.68% | 3.35% |
DCARX DFA California Municipal Real Return Portfolio | 1.84% | 2.64% | 3.16% | 2.63% | -1.06% | 6.21% | 2.35% | 5.08% | -0.46% | 1.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFLVX and DCARX is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2017 | 0.22 |
The correlation between DFLVX and DCARX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFLVX vs. DCARX — Risk / Return Rank
DFLVX
DCARX
DFLVX vs. DCARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio (DFLVX) and DFA California Municipal Real Return Portfolio (DCARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFLVX | DCARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.78 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.67 | 6.43 | -0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.59 | 17.30 | +3.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFLVX vs. DCARX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFLVX drawdown since its inception was -65.65%, which is greater than DCARX's maximum drawdown of -12.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFLVX and DCARX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFLVX | DCARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.65% | -12.27% | -53.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.86% | -0.47% | -5.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.64% | -1.39% | -15.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.83% | -4.79% | -15.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.46% | -0.37% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.46% | -0.74% | -7.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.60% | 0.17% | +1.43% |
Volatility
DFLVX vs. DCARX - Volatility Comparison
DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio (DFLVX) has a higher volatility of 3.77% compared to DFA California Municipal Real Return Portfolio (DCARX) at 0.34%. This indicates that DFLVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DCARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFLVX | DCARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.77% | 0.34% | +3.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.48% | 0.89% | +7.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.36% | 1.06% | +10.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.87% | 2.24% | +13.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.40% | 2.90% | +15.50% |
DFLVX vs. DCARX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFLVX has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than DCARX's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFLVX vs. DCARX - Dividend Comparison
DFLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than DCARX's 3.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCARX DFA California Municipal Real Return Portfolio | 3.22% | 3.11% | 3.52% | 1.84% | 0.90% | 0.78% | 1.12% | 1.43% | 1.27% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DFLVX DFA U.S. Large Cap Value Portfolio | 1.45% | 1.71% | 1.87% | 3.65% | 4.56% | 5.90% | 1.97% | 4.04% | 7.83% | 6.06% | 3.77% | 6.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFLVX and DCARX have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFLVX has higher volatility (3.77%) compared to DCARX (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFLVX dropped -65.65% vs DCARX's -12.27%.
DFLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFLVX and DCARX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer