PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFJ vs. UTES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFJ vs. UTES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFJ achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly higher than UTES's 0.26% return. Over the past 10 years, DFJ has underperformed UTES with an annualized return of 9.18%, while UTES has yielded a comparatively higher 12.27% annualized return.


DFJ

1D
0.31%
1M
-1.56%
YTD
10.31%
6M
11.99%
1Y
28.50%
3Y*
18.53%
5Y*
9.75%
10Y*
9.18%

UTES

1D
1.56%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
0.26%
6M
0.49%
1Y
8.95%
3Y*
22.00%
5Y*
15.32%
10Y*
12.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFJ vs. UTES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFJ
WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund
10.31%31.90%2.80%21.81%-9.00%0.38%1.29%16.98%-18.53%32.14%
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
0.26%25.71%45.35%-2.46%0.80%20.74%-0.30%25.48%5.14%14.21%

Correlation

The correlation between DFJ and UTES is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015

0.25

DFJ vs. UTES - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFJ
UTES

Industrials

27.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

16.1%

-

Basic Materials

13.3%

-

Financial Services

13.3%

-

Technology

12.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.1%

-

Healthcare

4.1%

-

Real Estate

2.9%

-

Utilities

1.6%
100.0%

Communication Services

1.5%

-

Energy

0.6%

-

Industrials

DFJ
27.0%
UTES

-

Consumer Cyclical

DFJ
16.1%
UTES

-

Basic Materials

DFJ
13.3%
UTES

-

Financial Services

DFJ
13.3%
UTES

-

Technology

DFJ
12.6%
UTES

-

Consumer Defensive

DFJ
7.1%
UTES

-

Healthcare

DFJ
4.1%
UTES

-

Real Estate

DFJ
2.9%
UTES

-

Utilities

DFJ
1.6%
UTES
100.0%

Communication Services

DFJ
1.5%
UTES

-

Energy

DFJ
0.6%
UTES

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFJ vs. UTES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFJ
DFJ Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
DFJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DFJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

UTES
UTES Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
UTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTES Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
UTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTES Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFJ vs. UTES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFJUTESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.08

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

0.60

+1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.97

1.32

+4.64

DFJ vs. UTES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the UTES Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFJ and UTES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFJ vs. UTES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFJ drawdown since its inception was -46.00%, which is greater than UTES's maximum drawdown of -35.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFJ and UTES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFJUTESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.00%

-35.39%

-10.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.03%

-13.88%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.03%

-17.62%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-20.40%

-9.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.02%

-35.39%

-4.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.85%

-9.10%

+3.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.15%

-5.53%

-5.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.61%

6.29%

-1.68%

Volatility

DFJ vs. UTES - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ) is 4.87%, while Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) has a volatility of 7.23%. This indicates that DFJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UTES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFJUTESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.87%

7.23%

-2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.79%

17.05%

-3.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.68%

21.32%

-4.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.94%

20.62%

-4.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.97%

20.17%

-3.20%

DFJ vs. UTES - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFJ has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than UTES's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFJ vs. UTES - Dividend Comparison

DFJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, more than UTES's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFJ
WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund
2.41%2.68%2.46%2.43%2.62%2.07%2.59%2.24%1.89%1.60%1.76%1.23%
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
1.49%1.42%1.51%2.44%2.13%1.94%2.09%1.84%2.09%3.44%3.53%0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFJ and UTES have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UTES has higher volatility (7.23%) compared to DFJ (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFJ dropped -46.00% vs UTES's -35.39%.

On 10-year performance, UTES leads with 12.27% vs 9.18% for DFJ. On fees, UTES is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, DFJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UTES has performed better with a 12.27% return vs 9.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UTES is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DFJ.

DFJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 1.49% for UTES.

DFJ is categorized as Japan Equities, while UTES is Utilities Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DFJ and 0.49% for UTES.

DFJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFJ and UTES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer