DFJ vs. NTSX
DFJ (WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund) and NTSX (WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - DFJ is a Japan Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Index, while NTSX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by WisdomTree. DFJ is passively managed, while NTSX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DFJ returned 9.51%/yr vs 9.69%/yr for NTSX. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFJ charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for NTSX.
Performance
DFJ vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DFJ having a 9.06% return and NTSX slightly lower at 8.62%.
DFJ
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 9.06%
- 6M
- 12.58%
- 1Y
- 26.81%
- 3Y*
- 18.99%
- 5Y*
- 9.51%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
NTSX
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 4.37%
- YTD
- 8.62%
- 6M
- 7.83%
- 1Y
- 25.27%
- 3Y*
- 19.38%
- 5Y*
- 9.69%
- 10Y*
- —
DFJ vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFJ WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund | 9.06% | 31.90% | 2.80% | 21.81% | -9.00% | 0.38% | 1.29% | 16.98% | -15.96% |
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund | 8.62% | 18.82% | 20.20% | 22.70% | -25.84% | 22.21% | 24.87% | 32.03% | -8.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFJ and NTSX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2018 | 0.53 |
The correlation between DFJ and NTSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DFJ vs. NTSX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFJ
NTSX
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Real Estate
Utilities
Communication Services
Energy
Industrials
DFJ
NTSX
Consumer Cyclical
DFJ
NTSX
Basic Materials
DFJ
NTSX
Financial Services
DFJ
NTSX
Technology
DFJ
NTSX
Consumer Defensive
DFJ
NTSX
Healthcare
DFJ
NTSX
Real Estate
DFJ
NTSX
Utilities
DFJ
NTSX
Communication Services
DFJ
NTSX
Energy
DFJ
NTSX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFJ vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank
DFJ
NTSX
DFJ vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFJ | NTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.37 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 2.77 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.01 | 12.25 | -6.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFJ | NTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 2.06 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.57 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.71 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
DFJ vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFJ drawdown since its inception was -46.00%, which is greater than NTSX's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFJ and NTSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFJ | NTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.00% | -31.34% | -14.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.03% | -9.16% | -3.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.03% | -16.82% | +3.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.71% | -31.34% | +1.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.92% | -1.05% | -5.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.15% | -6.79% | -4.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.47% | 2.07% | +2.40% |
Volatility
DFJ vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) at 3.39%. This indicates that DFJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFJ | NTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 3.39% | +0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.48% | 9.58% | +3.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.39% | 12.31% | +4.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.89% | 17.04% | -1.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 18.27% | -1.32% |
DFJ vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFJ has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFJ vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison
DFJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, more than NTSX's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFJ WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund | 2.44% | 2.68% | 2.46% | 2.43% | 2.62% | 2.07% | 2.59% | 2.24% | 1.89% | 1.60% | 1.76% | 1.23% |
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund | 1.08% | 1.14% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.36% | 0.82% | 0.92% | 1.42% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFJ and NTSX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFJ has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to NTSX (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFJ dropped -46.00% vs NTSX's -31.34%.
On 5-year performance, NTSX leads with 9.69% vs 9.51% for DFJ. On fees, NTSX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, NTSX has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NTSX has performed better with a 9.69% return vs 9.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NTSX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DFJ.
DFJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.44%, compared with 1.08% for NTSX.
DFJ is categorized as Japan Equities, while NTSX is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DFJ and 0.20% for NTSX.
NTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFJ and NTSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer