PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFJ vs. NTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFJ vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DFJ having a 9.06% return and NTSX slightly lower at 8.62%.


DFJ

1D
-0.46%
1M
2.01%
YTD
9.06%
6M
12.58%
1Y
26.81%
3Y*
18.99%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
8.70%

NTSX

1D
-1.05%
1M
4.37%
YTD
8.62%
6M
7.83%
1Y
25.27%
3Y*
19.38%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFJ vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DFJ
WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund
9.06%31.90%2.80%21.81%-9.00%0.38%1.29%16.98%-15.96%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
8.62%18.82%20.20%22.70%-25.84%22.21%24.87%32.03%-8.72%

Correlation

The correlation between DFJ and NTSX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2018

0.53

The correlation between DFJ and NTSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DFJ vs. NTSX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFJ
NTSX

Industrials

27.0%
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

16.1%
10.1%

Basic Materials

13.3%
1.4%

Financial Services

13.3%
12.3%

Technology

12.6%
35.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.1%
5.5%

Healthcare

4.1%
8.4%

Real Estate

2.9%
1.5%

Utilities

1.6%
2.1%

Communication Services

1.5%
12.5%

Energy

0.6%
3.5%

Industrials

DFJ
27.0%
NTSX
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

DFJ
16.1%
NTSX
10.1%

Basic Materials

DFJ
13.3%
NTSX
1.4%

Financial Services

DFJ
13.3%
NTSX
12.3%

Technology

DFJ
12.6%
NTSX
35.1%

Consumer Defensive

DFJ
7.1%
NTSX
5.5%

Healthcare

DFJ
4.1%
NTSX
8.4%

Real Estate

DFJ
2.9%
NTSX
1.5%

Utilities

DFJ
1.6%
NTSX
2.1%

Communication Services

DFJ
1.5%
NTSX
12.5%

Energy

DFJ
0.6%
NTSX
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFJ vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFJ
DFJ Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
DFJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFJ Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
DFJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSX
NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFJ vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFJNTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.37

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

2.77

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.01

12.25

-6.24

DFJ vs. NTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the NTSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFJ and NTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFJNTSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

2.06

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.57

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.71

-0.40

Drawdowns

DFJ vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFJ drawdown since its inception was -46.00%, which is greater than NTSX's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFJ and NTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFJNTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.00%

-31.34%

-14.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.03%

-9.16%

-3.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.03%

-16.82%

+3.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-31.34%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.92%

-1.05%

-5.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.15%

-6.79%

-4.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.47%

2.07%

+2.40%

Volatility

DFJ vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund (DFJ) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) at 3.39%. This indicates that DFJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFJNTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.15%

3.39%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.48%

9.58%

+3.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.39%

12.31%

+4.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.89%

17.04%

-1.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.95%

18.27%

-1.32%

DFJ vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFJ has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFJ vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison

DFJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, more than NTSX's 1.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFJ
WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund
2.44%2.68%2.46%2.43%2.62%2.07%2.59%2.24%1.89%1.60%1.76%1.23%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
1.08%1.14%1.14%1.21%1.36%0.82%0.92%1.42%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFJ and NTSX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFJ has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to NTSX (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFJ dropped -46.00% vs NTSX's -31.34%.

On 5-year performance, NTSX leads with 9.69% vs 9.51% for DFJ. On fees, NTSX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, NTSX has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NTSX has performed better with a 9.69% return vs 9.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NTSX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DFJ.

DFJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.44%, compared with 1.08% for NTSX.

DFJ is categorized as Japan Equities, while NTSX is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DFJ and 0.20% for NTSX.

NTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFJ and NTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer