PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFISX vs. RPMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFISX vs. RPMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX) and Reinhart Genesis PMV Fund (RPMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFISX achieves a 9.65% return, which is significantly lower than RPMAX's 20.12% return.


DFISX

1D
0.18%
1M
3.43%
YTD
9.65%
6M
13.12%
1Y
26.38%
3Y*
18.77%
5Y*
7.30%
10Y*
8.36%

RPMAX

1D
1.03%
1M
5.77%
YTD
20.12%
6M
21.11%
1Y
32.96%
3Y*
18.42%
5Y*
12.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFISX vs. RPMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DFISX
DFA International Small Company Portfolio
9.65%36.35%3.76%14.46%-17.13%10.71%9.27%24.18%-19.72%
RPMAX
Reinhart Genesis PMV Fund
20.12%5.13%14.59%23.64%-4.00%23.59%4.18%21.69%-8.63%

Correlation

The correlation between DFISX and RPMAX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2018

0.66

The correlation between DFISX and RPMAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFISX vs. RPMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFISX
DFISX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
DFISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFISX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
DFISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFISX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

RPMAX
RPMAX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
RPMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
RPMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFISX vs. RPMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX) and Reinhart Genesis PMV Fund (RPMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFISXRPMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.33

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

3.82

-1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.90

12.37

-4.47

DFISX vs. RPMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFISX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the RPMAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFISX and RPMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFISXRPMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

1.97

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.63

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.52

-0.06

Drawdowns

DFISX vs. RPMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFISX drawdown since its inception was -60.66%, which is greater than RPMAX's maximum drawdown of -45.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFISX and RPMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFISXRPMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.66%

-45.05%

-15.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.96%

-9.24%

-2.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.68%

-23.65%

+9.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.06%

-23.65%

-11.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

0.00%

-1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.64%

-6.58%

-5.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

2.84%

+0.40%

Volatility

DFISX vs. RPMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX) is 3.78%, while Reinhart Genesis PMV Fund (RPMAX) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that DFISX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RPMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFISXRPMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

4.40%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.00%

12.49%

-1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.77%

17.92%

-4.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.89%

20.00%

-4.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.20%

22.79%

-6.59%

DFISX vs. RPMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFISX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than RPMAX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFISX vs. RPMAX - Dividend Comparison

DFISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, less than RPMAX's 6.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFISX
DFA International Small Company Portfolio
2.87%3.19%3.39%3.01%3.51%3.06%1.71%4.54%7.74%1.27%4.44%4.47%
RPMAX
Reinhart Genesis PMV Fund
6.40%7.69%4.32%2.87%7.00%4.22%0.06%0.42%1.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFISX and RPMAX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RPMAX has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to DFISX (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFISX dropped -60.66% vs RPMAX's -45.05%.

RPMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFISX and RPMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer