PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFIS vs. RCL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFIS vs. RCL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional International Small Cap ETF (DFIS) and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFIS achieves a 10.06% return, which is significantly higher than RCL's 6.66% return.


DFIS

1D
0.57%
1M
0.95%
YTD
10.06%
6M
12.14%
1Y
26.57%
3Y*
18.52%
5Y*
10Y*

RCL

1D
2.23%
1M
13.68%
YTD
6.66%
6M
7.04%
1Y
16.02%
3Y*
46.74%
5Y*
27.43%
10Y*
16.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFIS vs. RCL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DFIS
Dimensional International Small Cap ETF
10.06%37.49%3.80%15.19%-12.50%
RCL
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
6.66%22.46%78.98%161.97%-34.50%

Correlation

The correlation between DFIS and RCL is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2022

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFIS vs. RCL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFIS
DFIS Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
DFIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFIS Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
DFIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFIS Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

RCL
RCL Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
RCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
RCL Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
RCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
RCL Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFIS vs. RCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Small Cap ETF (DFIS) and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFISRCLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.09

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

0.39

+1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.69

0.66

+7.03

DFIS vs. RCL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFIS Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is higher than the RCL Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFIS and RCL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFIS vs. RCL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFIS drawdown since its inception was -27.23%, smaller than the maximum RCL drawdown of -89.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIS and RCL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFISRCLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.23%

-89.49%

+62.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.44%

-32.36%

+19.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.55%

-35.02%

+21.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.10%

-18.16%

+16.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.15%

-27.76%

+21.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

19.15%

-15.88%

Volatility

DFIS vs. RCL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional International Small Cap ETF (DFIS) is 5.44%, while Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCL) has a volatility of 14.15%. This indicates that DFIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RCL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFISRCLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.44%

14.15%

-8.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.66%

38.00%

-25.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.05%

46.50%

-31.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.37%

48.52%

-31.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.37%

53.35%

-35.98%

Dividends

DFIS vs. RCL - Dividend Comparison

DFIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than RCL's 1.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFIS
Dimensional International Small Cap ETF
2.02%2.23%2.19%2.36%1.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RCL
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
1.70%1.25%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.04%2.22%2.66%1.81%2.08%1.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFIS and RCL have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RCL has higher volatility (14.15%) compared to DFIS (5.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIS dropped -27.23% vs RCL's -89.49%.

DFIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFIS and RCL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer