DFIS vs. MSFT
DFIS (Dimensional International Small Cap ETF) is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, DFIS returned 16.78%/yr vs 6.20%/yr for MSFT. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DFIS vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFIS achieves a 7.73% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -16.45% return.
DFIS
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -1.71%
- 6M
- 3.25%
- YTD
- 7.73%
- 1Y
- 19.69%
- 3Y*
- 16.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.66%
MSFT
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- 6.03%
- 6M
- -12.13%
- YTD
- -16.45%
- 1Y
- -20.50%
- 3Y*
- 6.20%
- 5Y*
- 8.30%
- 10Y*
- 23.18%
- ALL TIME*
- 24.73%
DFIS vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFIS Dimensional International Small Cap ETF | 7.73% | 37.49% | 3.80% | 15.19% | -12.50% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -16.45% | 15.58% | 12.93% | 58.19% | -19.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFIS and MSFT is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2022 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DFIS and MSFT has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFIS vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank
DFIS
MSFT
DFIS vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Small Cap ETF (DFIS) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFIS | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.88 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | -0.60 | +2.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.79 | -1.10 | +6.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFIS vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFIS drawdown since its inception was -27.23%, smaller than the maximum MSFT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIS and MSFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFIS | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.23% | -69.38% | +42.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.44% | -34.50% | +22.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.55% | -34.50% | +20.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.17% | -25.32% | +21.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.08% | -21.80% | +15.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.41% | 18.74% | -15.33% |
Volatility
DFIS vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional International Small Cap ETF (DFIS) is 3.66%, while Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a volatility of 10.25%. This indicates that DFIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFIS | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.66% | 10.25% | -6.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.01% | 24.51% | -11.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.16% | 27.52% | -12.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 27.07% | -9.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 27.15% | -9.88% |
Dividends
DFIS vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison
DFIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than MSFT's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFIS Dimensional International Small Cap ETF | 2.04% | 2.23% | 2.19% | 2.36% | 1.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.88% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFIS and MSFT have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSFT has higher volatility (10.25%) compared to DFIS (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIS dropped -27.23% vs MSFT's -69.38%.
DFIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFIS and MSFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer