PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFIS vs. ISCF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFIS vs. ISCF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional International Small Cap ETF (DFIS) and iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFIS achieves a 11.25% return, which is significantly higher than ISCF's 8.20% return.


DFIS

1D
0.88%
1M
2.95%
YTD
11.25%
6M
14.62%
1Y
28.32%
3Y*
19.89%
5Y*
10Y*

ISCF

1D
0.86%
1M
1.30%
YTD
8.20%
6M
11.04%
1Y
22.39%
3Y*
17.96%
5Y*
7.44%
10Y*
9.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFIS vs. ISCF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DFIS
Dimensional International Small Cap ETF
11.25%37.49%3.80%15.19%-12.94%
ISCF
iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
8.20%33.65%4.75%11.50%-10.89%

Correlation

The correlation between DFIS and ISCF is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2022

0.97

The correlation between DFIS and ISCF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFIS vs. ISCF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFIS
ISCF

Industrials

23.9%
23.3%

Basic Materials

14.2%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

13.5%
12.4%

Financial Services

12.0%
12.3%

Technology

9.6%
10.5%

Energy

6.0%
4.8%

Healthcare

5.2%
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
4.1%

Real Estate

3.7%
8.8%

Communication Services

3.6%
3.8%

Utilities

3.3%
3.6%

Industrials

DFIS
23.9%
ISCF
23.3%

Basic Materials

DFIS
14.2%
ISCF
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DFIS
13.5%
ISCF
12.4%

Financial Services

DFIS
12.0%
ISCF
12.3%

Technology

DFIS
9.6%
ISCF
10.5%

Energy

DFIS
6.0%
ISCF
4.8%

Healthcare

DFIS
5.2%
ISCF
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

DFIS
5.0%
ISCF
4.1%

Real Estate

DFIS
3.7%
ISCF
8.8%

Communication Services

DFIS
3.6%
ISCF
3.8%

Utilities

DFIS
3.3%
ISCF
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFIS vs. ISCF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFIS
DFIS Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
DFIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFIS Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
DFIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFIS Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

ISCF
ISCF Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
ISCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCF Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCF Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFIS vs. ISCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Small Cap ETF (DFIS) and iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFISISCFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.28

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

1.98

+0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.82

7.42

+1.40

DFIS vs. ISCF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFIS Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the ISCF Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFIS and ISCF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFISISCFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

1.56

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.49

+0.19

Drawdowns

DFIS vs. ISCF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFIS drawdown since its inception was -27.23%, smaller than the maximum ISCF drawdown of -40.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIS and ISCF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFISISCFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.23%

-40.79%

+13.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.44%

-11.34%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.55%

-13.85%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-1.80%

+0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.17%

-8.14%

+1.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.22%

3.03%

+0.19%

Volatility

DFIS vs. ISCF - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional International Small Cap ETF (DFIS) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF) at 4.25%. This indicates that DFIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFISISCFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

4.25%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.06%

11.88%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.53%

14.38%

+0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.32%

16.66%

+0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.32%

17.43%

-0.11%

DFIS vs. ISCF - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFIS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than ISCF's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFIS vs. ISCF - Dividend Comparison

DFIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than ISCF's 3.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFIS
Dimensional International Small Cap ETF
2.00%2.23%2.19%2.36%1.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ISCF
iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
3.47%3.76%4.29%3.94%2.73%3.93%2.30%2.87%2.14%1.97%2.89%1.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, DFIS and ISCF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DFIS has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to ISCF (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIS dropped -27.23% vs ISCF's -40.79%.

On 3-year performance, DFIS leads with 19.89% vs 17.96% for ISCF. On fees, DFIS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, ISCF has been the lower-risk option at 4.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFIS has performed better with a 19.89% return vs 17.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFIS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ISCF.

ISCF has the higher dividend yield at 3.47%, compared with 2.00% for DFIS.

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DFIS and 0.40% for ISCF.

DFIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFIS and ISCF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer