PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFIP vs. DFSV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFIP vs. DFSV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (DFIP) and Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF (DFSV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFIP achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly lower than DFSV's 16.23% return.


DFIP

1D
0.02%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
1.51%
6M
1.14%
1Y
4.69%
3Y*
4.12%
5Y*
10Y*

DFSV

1D
1.06%
1M
1.11%
YTD
16.23%
6M
16.16%
1Y
36.37%
3Y*
18.04%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFIP vs. DFSV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DFIP
Dimensional Inflation-Protected Securities ETF
1.51%7.54%1.72%4.07%-9.93%
DFSV
Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF
16.23%8.59%7.13%19.26%0.60%

Correlation

The correlation between DFIP and DFSV is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFIP vs. DFSV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFIP
DFIP Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
DFIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFIP Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
DFIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFIP Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

DFSV
DFSV Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
DFSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSV Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSV Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFIP vs. DFSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (DFIP) and Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF (DFSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFIPDFSVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.37

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

3.89

-1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.98

12.38

-5.40

DFIP vs. DFSV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFIP Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the DFSV Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFIP and DFSV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFIPDFSVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

2.08

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

0.54

-0.50

Drawdowns

DFIP vs. DFSV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFIP drawdown since its inception was -14.96%, smaller than the maximum DFSV drawdown of -28.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIP and DFSV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFIPDFSVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.96%

-28.02%

+13.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.06%

-9.39%

+7.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.82%

-28.02%

+23.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

0.00%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.94%

-6.70%

-0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.68%

2.94%

-2.26%

Volatility

DFIP vs. DFSV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (DFIP) is 0.93%, while Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF (DFSV) has a volatility of 3.89%. This indicates that DFIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFIPDFSVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

3.89%

-2.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.32%

11.31%

-8.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.44%

17.57%

-14.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.81%

22.24%

-15.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.81%

22.24%

-15.43%

DFIP vs. DFSV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFIP has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than DFSV's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFIP vs. DFSV - Dividend Comparison

DFIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, more than DFSV's 1.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DFIP
Dimensional Inflation-Protected Securities ETF
3.88%4.70%3.69%3.68%5.97%0.56%
DFSV
Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF
1.41%1.53%1.31%1.29%0.90%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFIP and DFSV have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFSV has higher volatility (3.89%) compared to DFIP (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIP dropped -14.96% vs DFSV's -28.02%.

On 3-year performance, DFSV leads with 18.04% vs 4.12% for DFIP. On fees, DFIP is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, DFIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFSV has performed better with a 18.04% return vs 4.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFIP is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for DFSV.

DFIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.88%, compared with 1.41% for DFSV.

DFIP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while DFSV is Small Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for DFIP and 0.31% for DFSV.

DFSV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFIP and DFSV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer