PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFIHX vs. TSDUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFIHX vs. TSDUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA One Year Fixed Income Portfolio (DFIHX) and Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Ultra-ShortTerm Fixed Income Fund (TSDUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DFIHX having a 1.99% return and TSDUX slightly lower at 1.91%. Over the past 10 years, DFIHX has underperformed TSDUX with an annualized return of 2.01%, while TSDUX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.67% annualized return.


DFIHX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.23%
6M
1.69%
YTD
1.99%
1Y
3.82%
3Y*
4.38%
5Y*
2.85%
10Y*
2.01%
ALL TIME*
12.93%

TSDUX

1D
-0.41%
1M
0.00%
6M
1.45%
YTD
1.91%
1Y
2.71%
3Y*
4.61%
5Y*
3.44%
10Y*
2.67%
ALL TIME*
2.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DFIHX vs. TSDUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFIHX
DFA One Year Fixed Income Portfolio
1.99%3.41%5.41%4.98%-1.19%-0.19%0.62%2.44%1.87%0.94%
TSDUX
Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Ultra-ShortTerm Fixed Income Fund
1.91%3.24%6.04%5.94%0.41%-0.11%2.06%2.65%1.64%1.73%

Correlation

The correlation between DFIHX and TSDUX is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2016

-0.06

The correlation between DFIHX and TSDUX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.06 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFIHX vs. TSDUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFIHX
DFIHX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
DFIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
DFIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

TSDUX
TSDUX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
TSDUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSDUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSDUX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
TSDUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSDUX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFIHX vs. TSDUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA One Year Fixed Income Portfolio (DFIHX) and Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Ultra-ShortTerm Fixed Income Fund (TSDUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFIHXTSDUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+11.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

6.80

2.46

+4.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

39.48

7.33

+32.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

231.88

23.71

+208.17

DFIHX vs. TSDUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFIHX Sharpe Ratio is 5.94, which is higher than the TSDUX Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFIHX and TSDUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFIHX vs. TSDUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFIHX drawdown since its inception was -2.53%, smaller than the maximum TSDUX drawdown of -3.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIHX and TSDUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFIHXTSDUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.53%

-3.94%

+1.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.10%

-0.41%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.49%

-0.73%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.26%

-1.72%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-2.26%

-3.94%

+1.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.41%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.15%

-0.18%

+0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.02%

0.12%

-0.10%

Volatility

DFIHX vs. TSDUX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA One Year Fixed Income Portfolio (DFIHX) is 0.21%, while Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Ultra-ShortTerm Fixed Income Fund (TSDUX) has a volatility of 0.47%. This indicates that DFIHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSDUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFIHXTSDUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.21%

0.47%

-0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.51%

0.66%

-0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65%

1.05%

-0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.01%

1.12%

-0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.80%

1.09%

-0.29%

DFIHX vs. TSDUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFIHX has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than TSDUX's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFIHX vs. TSDUX - Dividend Comparison

DFIHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, more than TSDUX's 2.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFIHX
DFA One Year Fixed Income Portfolio
3.86%3.26%4.99%3.37%1.07%0.00%0.62%2.12%1.85%1.13%0.66%0.51%
TSDUX
Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Ultra-ShortTerm Fixed Income Fund
2.47%3.09%5.03%1.55%6.36%0.60%1.65%2.84%2.66%2.22%1.87%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFIHX and TSDUX have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSDUX has higher volatility (0.47%) compared to DFIHX (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIHX dropped -2.53% vs TSDUX's -3.94%.

DFIHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.94 vs 2.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFIHX and TSDUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer