PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFIEX vs. DFSMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFIEX vs. DFSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA International Core Equity 2 Portfolio Institutional Class (DFIEX) and DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFIEX achieves a 13.00% return, which is significantly higher than DFSMX's 1.27% return. Over the past 10 years, DFIEX has outperformed DFSMX with an annualized return of 10.21%, while DFSMX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.23% annualized return.


DFIEX

1D
2.44%
1M
2.54%
6M
7.34%
YTD
13.00%
1Y
27.94%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
10.39%
10Y*
10.21%
ALL TIME*
7.07%

DFSMX

1D
0.01%
1M
0.11%
6M
0.95%
YTD
1.27%
1Y
2.25%
3Y*
2.65%
5Y*
1.76%
10Y*
1.23%
ALL TIME*
1.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DFIEX vs. DFSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFIEX
DFA International Core Equity 2 Portfolio Institutional Class
13.00%36.18%3.99%17.50%-13.51%13.85%7.73%21.70%-17.41%28.04%
DFSMX
DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio
1.27%2.30%2.84%2.98%-0.36%-0.11%0.83%1.62%1.22%1.15%

Correlation

The correlation between DFIEX and DFSMX is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2005

-0.03

The correlation between DFIEX and DFSMX shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.09 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFIEX vs. DFSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFIEX
DFIEX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
DFIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DFIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

DFSMX
DFSMX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
DFSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFIEX vs. DFSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA International Core Equity 2 Portfolio Institutional Class (DFIEX) and DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFIEXDFSMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-8.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

5.99

-4.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

22.52

-20.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.75

86.52

-76.77

DFIEX vs. DFSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFIEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is lower than the DFSMX Sharpe Ratio of 4.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFIEX and DFSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFIEX vs. DFSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFIEX drawdown since its inception was -62.22%, which is greater than DFSMX's maximum drawdown of -2.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIEX and DFSMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFIEXDFSMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.22%

-2.66%

-59.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.01%

-0.11%

-10.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.81%

-0.49%

-12.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.66%

-1.66%

-27.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.04%

-1.69%

-39.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.09%

-0.23%

-11.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

0.03%

+2.79%

Volatility

DFIEX vs. DFSMX - Volatility Comparison

DFA International Core Equity 2 Portfolio Institutional Class (DFIEX) has a higher volatility of 4.28% compared to DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX) at 0.17%. This indicates that DFIEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFIEXDFSMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.28%

0.17%

+4.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.23%

0.38%

+11.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.50%

0.54%

+13.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.82%

0.79%

+15.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.12%

0.76%

+15.36%

DFIEX vs. DFSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFIEX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than DFSMX's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFIEX vs. DFSMX - Dividend Comparison

DFIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, more than DFSMX's 2.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFIEX
DFA International Core Equity 2 Portfolio Institutional Class
2.93%3.22%3.42%3.36%2.88%2.98%1.77%2.90%2.95%2.49%2.76%4.20%
DFSMX
DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio
2.53%2.08%2.80%1.94%0.63%0.19%0.83%1.22%1.11%0.95%0.94%0.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFIEX and DFSMX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFIEX has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to DFSMX (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIEX dropped -62.22% vs DFSMX's -2.66%.

DFSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.43 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFIEX and DFSMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer