DFIEX vs. DCMSX

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

DFIEX (DFA International Core Equity 2 Portfolio Institutional Class) and DCMSX (DFA Commodity Strategy Portfolio) are both mutual funds - DFIEX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Dimensional, while DCMSX is a Commodities fund managed by Dimensional. Over the past 10 years, DFIEX returned 10.21%/yr vs 7.74%/yr for DCMSX. Their 0.36 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. DFIEX charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for DCMSX.

Performance

DFIEX vs. DCMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA International Core Equity 2 Portfolio Institutional Class (DFIEX) and DFA Commodity Strategy Portfolio (DCMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFIEX achieves a 13.00% return, which is significantly lower than DCMSX's 26.50% return. Over the past 10 years, DFIEX has outperformed DCMSX with an annualized return of 10.21%, while DCMSX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.74% annualized return.

DFIEX

• 1D: 2.44%
• 1M: 2.54%
• 6M: 7.34%
• YTD: 13.00%
• 1Y: 27.94%
• 3Y*: 18.16%
• 5Y*: 10.39%
• 10Y*: 10.21%
• ALL TIME*: 7.07%

DCMSX

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 6.99%
• 6M: 12.68%
• YTD: 26.50%
• 1Y: 39.23%
• 3Y*: 13.08%
• 5Y*: 10.75%
• 10Y*: 7.74%
• ALL TIME*: 1.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DCMSX DFA Commodity Strategy Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
DFIEX DFA International Core Equity 2 Portfolio Institutional Class	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

DFIEX vs. DCMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DFIEX DFA International Core Equity 2 Portfolio Institutional Class	13.00%	36.18%	3.99%	17.50%	-13.51%	13.85%	7.73%	21.70%	-17.41%	28.04%
DCMSX DFA Commodity Strategy Portfolio	26.50%	15.15%	5.90%	-9.14%	11.36%	33.54%	-1.78%	7.96%	-11.22%	2.73%

Correlation

The correlation between DFIEX and DCMSX is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.18
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.27
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2010	0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between DFIEX and DCMSX has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

DFIEX vs. DCMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFIEX

DFIEX Risk / Return Rank: 80
DFIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
DFIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
DFIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
DFIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
DFIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

DCMSX

DCMSX Risk / Return Rank: 80
DCMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
DCMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
DCMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
DCMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
DCMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFIEX vs. DCMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA International Core Equity 2 Portfolio Institutional Class (DFIEX) and DFA Commodity Strategy Portfolio (DCMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFIEX	DCMSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	2.14	-0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	2.79	-0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.37	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.50	2.61	-0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.75	8.68	+1.07

DFIEX vs. DCMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFIEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the DCMSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFIEX and DCMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DFIEX vs. DCMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFIEX drawdown since its inception was -62.22%, roughly equal to the maximum DCMSX drawdown of -60.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIEX and DCMSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFIEX	DCMSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.22%	-60.94%	-1.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.01%	-13.81%	+2.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.81%	-13.81%	+1.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.66%	-27.93%	-0.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.04%	-32.52%	-8.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-6.91%	+6.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.09%	-31.55%	+19.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.82%	4.20%	-1.38%

Volatility

DFIEX vs. DCMSX - Volatility Comparison

DFA International Core Equity 2 Portfolio Institutional Class (DFIEX) and DFA Commodity Strategy Portfolio (DCMSX) have volatilities of 4.28% and 4.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFIEX	DCMSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.28%	4.50%	-0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.23%	13.81%	-1.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.50%	16.82%	-2.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.82%	16.29%	-0.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.12%	14.47%	+1.65%

DFIEX vs. DCMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFIEX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than DCMSX's 0.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFIEX vs. DCMSX - Dividend Comparison

DFIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, less than DCMSX's 8.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DCMSX DFA Commodity Strategy Portfolio	8.43%	10.75%	2.83%	2.52%	7.46%	49.44%	0.37%	1.51%	1.63%	3.09%	0.47%	0.15%
DFIEX DFA International Core Equity 2 Portfolio Institutional Class	2.93%	3.22%	3.42%	3.36%	2.88%	2.98%	1.77%	2.90%	2.95%	2.49%	2.76%	4.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFIEX and DCMSX in my portfolio?

DFIEX and DCMSX have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFIEX or DCMSX?

DCMSX has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to DFIEX (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIEX dropped -62.22% vs DCMSX's -60.94%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DCMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.