DFGR vs. SRVR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DFGR (Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF) and SRVR (Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF) are both REIT funds. DFGR is actively managed, while SRVR is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFGR returned 11.14%/yr vs 8.93%/yr for SRVR. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFGR charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SRVR.

Performance

DFGR vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF (DFGR) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFGR achieves a 10.41% return, which is significantly lower than SRVR's 17.97% return.

DFGR

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 10.41%
• 6M: 10.83%
• 1Y: 11.18%
• 3Y*: 11.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SRVR

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: -2.35%
• YTD: 17.97%
• 6M: 18.04%
• 1Y: 5.84%
• 3Y*: 8.93%
• 5Y*: -1.27%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFGR vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DFGR Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF	10.41%	7.65%	1.89%	9.64%	-1.20%
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF	17.97%	-1.99%	2.70%	6.84%	-3.45%

Correlation

The correlation between DFGR and SRVR is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2022	0.80

The correlation between DFGR and SRVR shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DFGR vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFGR

DFGR Risk / Return Rank: 27
DFGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
DFGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
DFGR Omega Ratio Rank: 25
DFGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
DFGR Martin Ratio Rank: 31

SRVR

SRVR Risk / Return Rank: 13
SRVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
SRVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
SRVR Omega Ratio Rank: 13
SRVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
SRVR Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFGR vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF (DFGR) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFGR	SRVR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	0.34	+0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.32	0.60	+0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.07	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.23	0.40	+0.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.32	0.84	+3.48

DFGR vs. SRVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFGR Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is higher than the SRVR Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFGR and SRVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DFGR vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFGR drawdown since its inception was -21.28%, smaller than the maximum SRVR drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFGR and SRVR.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFGR	SRVR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.28%	-40.99%	+19.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.15%	-14.78%	+5.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.57%	-18.34%	+0.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-40.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.42%	-13.62%	+12.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.22%	-15.24%	+9.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.59%	6.94%	-4.35%

Volatility

DFGR vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF (DFGR) is 4.22%, while Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that DFGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFGR	SRVR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.22%	5.66%	-1.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.34%	13.59%	-4.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.29%	17.29%	-5.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.42%	19.78%	-4.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.42%	21.44%	-6.02%

DFGR vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFGR has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than SRVR's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFGR vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison

DFGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, more than SRVR's 2.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DFGR Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF	3.85%	4.05%	3.73%	2.77%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF	2.59%	2.67%	2.00%	3.69%	1.70%	1.19%	1.59%	1.61%	2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFGR and SRVR in my portfolio?

DFGR and SRVR have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFGR or SRVR?

SRVR has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to DFGR (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFGR dropped -21.28% vs SRVR's -40.99%.

Which ETF is better, DFGR or SRVR?

On 3-year performance, DFGR leads with 11.14% vs 8.93% for SRVR. On fees, DFGR is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, DFGR has been the lower-risk option at 4.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFGR or SRVR?

Over the 3-year period, DFGR has performed better with a 11.14% return vs 8.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFGR or SRVR?

DFGR is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SRVR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFGR or SRVR?

DFGR has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 2.59% for SRVR.

What is the main difference between DFGR and SRVR?

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for DFGR and 0.60% for SRVR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFGR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.