PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFGR vs. FREL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFGR vs. FREL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF (DFGR) and Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DFGR having a 7.61% return and FREL slightly lower at 7.59%.


DFGR

1D
-0.28%
1M
-1.00%
YTD
7.61%
6M
7.46%
1Y
10.27%
3Y*
8.89%
5Y*
10Y*

FREL

1D
-0.14%
1M
-1.00%
YTD
7.59%
6M
6.51%
1Y
9.81%
3Y*
9.05%
5Y*
2.09%
10Y*
5.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFGR vs. FREL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DFGR
Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF
7.61%7.65%1.89%9.64%-1.24%
FREL
Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF
7.59%3.09%5.05%11.74%-2.09%

Correlation

The correlation between DFGR and FREL is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2022

0.97

The correlation between DFGR and FREL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFGR vs. FREL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFGR
FREL

Real Estate

99.1%
97.6%

Financial Services

0.1%
0.0%

Technology

0.1%
0.3%

Communication Services

0.0%
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%

-

Healthcare

0.0%

-

Industrials

0.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.0%

-

Energy

0.0%
0.1%

Utilities

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

1.2%

Real Estate

DFGR
99.1%
FREL
97.6%

Financial Services

DFGR
0.1%
FREL
0.0%

Technology

DFGR
0.1%
FREL
0.3%

Communication Services

DFGR
0.0%
FREL
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

DFGR
0.0%
FREL

-

Healthcare

DFGR
0.0%
FREL

-

Industrials

DFGR
0.0%
FREL

-

Consumer Defensive

DFGR
0.0%
FREL

-

Energy

DFGR
0.0%
FREL
0.1%

Utilities

DFGR
0.0%
FREL

-

Basic Materials

DFGR

-

FREL
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFGR vs. FREL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFGR
DFGR Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
DFGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFGR Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
DFGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFGR Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

FREL
FREL Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
FREL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FREL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FREL Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FREL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FREL Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFGR vs. FREL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF (DFGR) and Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFGRFRELDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.14

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

1.17

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.00

3.67

+0.33

DFGR vs. FREL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFGR Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the FREL Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFGR and FREL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFGRFRELDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

0.75

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.25

+0.22

Drawdowns

DFGR vs. FREL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFGR drawdown since its inception was -21.28%, smaller than the maximum FREL drawdown of -42.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFGR and FREL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFGRFRELDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.28%

-42.61%

+21.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.15%

-8.45%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.57%

-17.54%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.76%

-3.93%

+1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.30%

-9.95%

+3.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

2.68%

-0.10%

Volatility

DFGR vs. FREL - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF (DFGR) and Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL) have volatilities of 3.61% and 3.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFGRFRELDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.61%

3.75%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.75%

9.27%

-0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.86%

13.17%

-1.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.42%

18.84%

-3.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.42%

20.67%

-5.25%

DFGR vs. FREL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFGR has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than FREL's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFGR vs. FREL - Dividend Comparison

DFGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, more than FREL's 3.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFGR
Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF
3.95%4.05%3.73%2.77%0.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FREL
Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF
3.34%3.59%3.48%3.73%3.57%2.34%3.77%3.32%5.54%3.27%4.01%3.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, DFGR and FREL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FREL has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to DFGR (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFGR dropped -21.28% vs FREL's -42.61%.

On 3-year performance, FREL leads with 9.05% vs 8.89% for DFGR. On fees, FREL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DFGR has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, FREL has performed better with a 9.05% return vs 8.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FREL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for DFGR.

DFGR has the higher dividend yield at 3.95%, compared with 3.34% for FREL.

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for DFGR and 0.08% for FREL.

DFGR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFGR and FREL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer