DFGR vs. FREL
DFGR (Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF) and FREL (Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF) are both REIT funds. DFGR is actively managed, while FREL is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFGR returned 8.89%/yr vs 9.05%/yr for FREL. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DFGR charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FREL.
Performance
DFGR vs. FREL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DFGR having a 7.61% return and FREL slightly lower at 7.59%.
DFGR
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- YTD
- 7.61%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 10.27%
- 3Y*
- 8.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FREL
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- YTD
- 7.59%
- 6M
- 6.51%
- 1Y
- 9.81%
- 3Y*
- 9.05%
- 5Y*
- 2.09%
- 10Y*
- 5.67%
DFGR vs. FREL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFGR Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF | 7.61% | 7.65% | 1.89% | 9.64% | -1.24% |
FREL Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF | 7.59% | 3.09% | 5.05% | 11.74% | -2.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFGR and FREL is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2022 | 0.97 |
The correlation between DFGR and FREL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFGR vs. FREL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFGR
FREL
Real Estate
Financial Services
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
DFGR
FREL
Financial Services
DFGR
FREL
Technology
DFGR
FREL
Communication Services
DFGR
FREL
Consumer Cyclical
DFGR
FREL
-
Healthcare
DFGR
FREL
-
Industrials
DFGR
FREL
-
Consumer Defensive
DFGR
FREL
-
Energy
DFGR
FREL
Utilities
DFGR
FREL
-
Basic Materials
DFGR
-
FREL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFGR vs. FREL — Risk / Return Rank
DFGR
FREL
DFGR vs. FREL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF (DFGR) and Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFGR | FREL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.14 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 1.17 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.00 | 3.67 | +0.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFGR | FREL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 0.75 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.25 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
DFGR vs. FREL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFGR drawdown since its inception was -21.28%, smaller than the maximum FREL drawdown of -42.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFGR and FREL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFGR | FREL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.28% | -42.61% | +21.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.15% | -8.45% | -0.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.57% | -17.54% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.76% | -3.93% | +1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.30% | -9.95% | +3.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 2.68% | -0.10% |
Volatility
DFGR vs. FREL - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF (DFGR) and Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL) have volatilities of 3.61% and 3.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFGR | FREL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.61% | 3.75% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.75% | 9.27% | -0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.86% | 13.17% | -1.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 18.84% | -3.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 20.67% | -5.25% |
DFGR vs. FREL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFGR has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than FREL's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFGR vs. FREL - Dividend Comparison
DFGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, more than FREL's 3.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFGR Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF | 3.95% | 4.05% | 3.73% | 2.77% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FREL Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF | 3.34% | 3.59% | 3.48% | 3.73% | 3.57% | 2.34% | 3.77% | 3.32% | 5.54% | 3.27% | 4.01% | 3.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, DFGR and FREL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FREL has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to DFGR (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFGR dropped -21.28% vs FREL's -42.61%.
On 3-year performance, FREL leads with 9.05% vs 8.89% for DFGR. On fees, FREL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DFGR has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FREL has performed better with a 9.05% return vs 8.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FREL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for DFGR.
DFGR has the higher dividend yield at 3.95%, compared with 3.34% for FREL.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for DFGR and 0.08% for FREL.
DFGR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFGR and FREL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer