DFGR vs. DTCR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DFGR (Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF) and DTCR (Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF) are both REIT funds. DFGR is actively managed, while DTCR is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFGR returned 8.89%/yr vs 36.32%/yr for DTCR. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFGR charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DTCR.

Performance

DFGR vs. DTCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF (DFGR) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFGR achieves a 7.61% return, which is significantly lower than DTCR's 52.56% return.

DFGR

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -1.00%
• YTD: 7.61%
• 6M: 7.46%
• 1Y: 10.27%
• 3Y*: 8.89%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DTCR

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: 11.31%
• YTD: 52.56%
• 6M: 54.49%
• 1Y: 84.73%
• 3Y*: 36.32%
• 5Y*: 15.53%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFGR vs. DTCR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DFGR Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF	7.61%	7.65%	1.89%	9.64%	-1.24%
DTCR Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF	52.56%	28.99%	14.92%	18.93%	-2.29%

Correlation

The correlation between DFGR and DTCR is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2022	0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between DFGR and DTCR has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DFGR vs. DTCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DFGR	DTCR
Real Estate	99.1%	56.8%
Financial Services	0.1%	-
Technology	0.1%	40.8%
Communication Services	0.0%	2.5%
Consumer Cyclical	0.0%	-
Healthcare	0.0%	-
Industrials	0.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	-
Energy	0.0%	-
Utilities	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-

Return for Risk

DFGR vs. DTCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFGR

DFGR Risk / Return Rank: 24
DFGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
DFGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
DFGR Omega Ratio Rank: 23
DFGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
DFGR Martin Ratio Rank: 28

DTCR

DTCR Risk / Return Rank: 92
DTCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
DTCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
DTCR Omega Ratio Rank: 91
DTCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
DTCR Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFGR vs. DTCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF (DFGR) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFGR	DTCR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	3.90	-3.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.26	4.71	-3.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.61	-0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.13	6.61	-5.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.00	20.78	-16.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DFGR vs. DTCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFGR Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the DTCR Sharpe Ratio of 3.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFGR and DTCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFGR	DTCR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87	3.90	-3.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.72	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.76	-0.29

Drawdowns

DFGR vs. DTCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFGR drawdown since its inception was -21.28%, smaller than the maximum DTCR drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFGR and DTCR.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFGR	DTCR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.28%	-38.98%	+17.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.15%	-12.89%	+3.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.57%	-24.96%	+7.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.76%	-0.74%	-2.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.30%	-12.37%	+6.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.58%	4.09%	-1.51%

Volatility

DFGR vs. DTCR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF (DFGR) is 3.61%, while Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that DFGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DTCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFGR	DTCR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.61%	7.16%	-3.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.75%	16.92%	-8.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.86%	21.84%	-9.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.42%	21.83%	-6.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.42%	21.90%	-6.48%

DFGR vs. DTCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFGR has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than DTCR's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFGR vs. DTCR - Dividend Comparison

DFGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, more than DTCR's 0.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DFGR Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF	3.95%	4.05%	3.73%	2.77%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%
DTCR Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF	0.72%	1.10%	1.72%	1.18%	2.57%	1.27%	0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFGR and DTCR in my portfolio?

DFGR and DTCR have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFGR or DTCR?

DTCR has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to DFGR (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFGR dropped -21.28% vs DTCR's -38.98%.

Which ETF is better, DFGR or DTCR?

On 3-year performance, DTCR leads with 36.32% vs 8.89% for DFGR. On fees, DFGR is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, DFGR has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFGR or DTCR?

Over the 3-year period, DTCR has performed better with a 36.32% return vs 8.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFGR or DTCR?

DFGR is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DTCR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFGR or DTCR?

DFGR has the higher dividend yield at 3.95%, compared with 0.72% for DTCR.

What is the main difference between DFGR and DTCR?

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for DFGR and 0.50% for DTCR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DTCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.90 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.