DFGP vs. BINC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF (DFGP) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC).

DFGP and BINC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DFGP is an actively managed fund by Dimensional. It was launched on Nov 7, 2023. BINC is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on May 19, 2023.

Performance

DFGP vs. BINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF (DFGP) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DFGP vs. BINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DFGP Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF	-0.15%	5.89%	3.71%	6.24%
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF	-0.78%	7.57%	5.76%	4.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFGP achieves a -0.15% return, which is significantly higher than BINC's -0.78% return.

DFGP

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: -2.17%
• YTD: -0.15%
• 6M: 0.35%
• 1Y: 4.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BINC

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: -2.11%
• YTD: -0.78%
• 6M: 0.65%
• 1Y: 5.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFGP vs. BINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFGP has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than BINC's 0.40% expense ratio.

BINC

iShares Flexible Income Active ETF

DFGP

Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF

Return for Risk

DFGP vs. BINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFGP

DFGP Risk / Return Rank: 57
DFGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
DFGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
DFGP Omega Ratio Rank: 53
DFGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
DFGP Martin Ratio Rank: 58

BINC

BINC Risk / Return Rank: 84
BINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
BINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
BINC Omega Ratio Rank: 91
BINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
BINC Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFGP vs. BINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF (DFGP) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFGP	BINC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.05	1.74	-0.69
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.43	2.29	-0.85
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.38	-0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.40	1.91	-0.51
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.50	7.93	-2.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DFGP vs. BINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFGP Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the BINC Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFGP and BINC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFGP	BINC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.05	1.74	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.44	2.28	-0.85

Correlation

The correlation between DFGP and BINC is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

DFGP vs. BINC - Dividend Comparison

DFGP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, less than BINC's 5.91% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DFGP Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF	3.36%	3.45%	4.51%	0.62%
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF	5.91%	5.86%	6.14%	3.13%

Drawdowns

DFGP vs. BINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFGP drawdown since its inception was -3.24%, which is greater than BINC's maximum drawdown of -2.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFGP and BINC.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFGP	BINC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.24%	-2.69%	-0.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.24%	-2.69%	-0.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.17%	-2.14%	-0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.73%	-0.33%	-0.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.83%	0.65%	+0.18%

Volatility

DFGP vs. BINC - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF (DFGP) has a higher volatility of 2.15% compared to iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) at 1.25%. This indicates that DFGP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFGP	BINC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.15%	1.25%	+0.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.72%	1.69%	+1.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.26%	2.94%	+1.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.63%	3.03%	+1.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.63%	3.03%	+1.60%