PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFETX vs. WAEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFETX vs. WAEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Emerging Markets II Portfolio (DFETX) and Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund (WAEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFETX achieves a 30.43% return, which is significantly higher than WAEMX's 24.12% return. Over the past 10 years, DFETX has outperformed WAEMX with an annualized return of 11.54%, while WAEMX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.47% annualized return.


DFETX

1D
-0.66%
1M
8.42%
YTD
30.43%
6M
33.83%
1Y
57.92%
3Y*
25.69%
5Y*
10.03%
10Y*
11.54%

WAEMX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.40%
YTD
24.12%
6M
28.62%
1Y
34.27%
3Y*
12.28%
5Y*
2.04%
10Y*
8.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFETX vs. WAEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFETX
DFA Emerging Markets II Portfolio
30.43%33.54%6.86%13.11%-16.84%2.58%14.08%16.30%-13.47%36.75%
WAEMX
Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund
24.12%5.85%-2.21%21.20%-38.76%30.16%32.79%27.45%-18.97%38.20%

Correlation

The correlation between DFETX and WAEMX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2007

0.78

The correlation between DFETX and WAEMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (3 years) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFETX vs. WAEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFETX
DFETX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
DFETX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFETX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFETX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DFETX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFETX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

WAEMX
WAEMX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
WAEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WAEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
WAEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
WAEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
WAEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFETX vs. WAEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Emerging Markets II Portfolio (DFETX) and Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund (WAEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFETXWAEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

1.36

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.71

4.49

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.99

13.87

+5.13

DFETX vs. WAEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFETX Sharpe Ratio is 3.60, which is higher than the WAEMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFETX and WAEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFETXWAEMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.60

2.03

+1.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.12

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.47

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.30

+0.10

Drawdowns

DFETX vs. WAEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFETX drawdown since its inception was -62.33%, smaller than the maximum WAEMX drawdown of -66.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFETX and WAEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFETXWAEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.33%

-66.35%

+4.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.84%

-7.89%

-4.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.13%

-25.56%

+9.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.80%

-44.88%

+13.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.20%

-44.88%

+4.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-8.18%

+7.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.67%

-16.81%

+1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

2.55%

+0.62%

Volatility

DFETX vs. WAEMX - Volatility Comparison

DFA Emerging Markets II Portfolio (DFETX) has a higher volatility of 7.65% compared to Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund (WAEMX) at 5.64%. This indicates that DFETX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WAEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFETXWAEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.65%

5.64%

+2.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.74%

14.59%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.80%

17.48%

-0.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.80%

17.73%

-1.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.62%

18.19%

-1.57%

DFETX vs. WAEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFETX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than WAEMX's 1.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFETX vs. WAEMX - Dividend Comparison

DFETX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.32%, less than WAEMX's 56.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFETX
DFA Emerging Markets II Portfolio
6.32%8.24%3.50%3.84%9.30%19.29%11.79%12.48%8.49%1.93%2.40%3.40%
WAEMX
Wasatch Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund
56.72%70.40%6.49%0.00%3.32%6.03%7.15%5.82%12.81%0.00%0.00%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFETX and WAEMX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFETX has higher volatility (7.65%) compared to WAEMX (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFETX dropped -62.33% vs WAEMX's -66.35%.

DFETX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.60 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFETX and WAEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer