DFETX vs. LCSMX
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA Emerging Markets II Portfolio (DFETX) and Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund (LCSMX).
DFETX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Aug 13, 1997. LCSMX is managed by Legg Mason. It was launched on Jan 9, 2018.
Performance
DFETX vs. LCSMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DFETX vs. LCSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFETX DFA Emerging Markets II Portfolio | 1.14% | 33.54% | 6.86% | 13.11% | -16.84% | 2.58% | 14.08% | 16.30% | -16.18% |
LCSMX Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund | 9.17% | 51.52% | -13.60% | 16.26% | -27.25% | 4.73% | 35.72% | 6.81% | 1.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFETX achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly lower than LCSMX's 9.17% return.
DFETX
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -12.15%
- YTD
- 1.14%
- 6M
- 6.52%
- 1Y
- 31.31%
- 3Y*
- 15.75%
- 5Y*
- 5.87%
- 10Y*
- 8.64%
LCSMX
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- -14.64%
- YTD
- 9.17%
- 6M
- 25.14%
- 1Y
- 60.99%
- 3Y*
- 16.35%
- 5Y*
- 4.66%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFETX vs. LCSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFETX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than LCSMX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DFETX vs. LCSMX — Risk / Return Rank
DFETX
LCSMX
DFETX vs. LCSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Emerging Markets II Portfolio (DFETX) and Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund (LCSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFETX | LCSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.93 | 2.76 | -0.83 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.51 | 3.31 | -0.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.51 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | 3.68 | -1.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.71 | 15.56 | -6.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFETX | LCSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93 | 2.76 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.26 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.41 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between DFETX and LCSMX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DFETX vs. LCSMX - Dividend Comparison
DFETX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.14%, more than LCSMX's 0.91% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFETX DFA Emerging Markets II Portfolio | 8.14% | 8.24% | 3.50% | 3.84% | 9.30% | 19.29% | 11.79% | 12.48% | 8.49% | 1.93% | 2.40% | 3.40% |
LCSMX Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund | 0.91% | 1.00% | 1.29% | 1.22% | 1.11% | 3.03% | 0.48% | 0.88% | 1.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DFETX vs. LCSMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFETX drawdown since its inception was -62.33%, which is greater than LCSMX's maximum drawdown of -39.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFETX and LCSMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFETX | LCSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.33% | -39.72% | -22.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.84% | -15.39% | +2.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.80% | -39.72% | +7.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.84% | -15.39% | +2.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.76% | -13.97% | -1.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.28% | 3.64% | -0.36% |
Volatility
DFETX vs. LCSMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DFA Emerging Markets II Portfolio (DFETX) is 7.99%, while Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund (LCSMX) has a volatility of 11.71%. This indicates that DFETX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DFETX | LCSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.99% | 11.71% | -3.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.84% | 17.87% | -6.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.25% | 21.99% | -5.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.28% | 17.88% | -2.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 19.34% | -2.96% |