PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFETX vs. HLFMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFETX vs. HLFMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Emerging Markets II Portfolio (DFETX) and Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFETX achieves a 19.35% return, which is significantly higher than HLFMX's 5.94% return. Over the past 10 years, DFETX has outperformed HLFMX with an annualized return of 9.67%, while HLFMX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.32% annualized return.


DFETX

1D
1.94%
1M
-2.12%
6M
10.61%
YTD
19.35%
1Y
38.13%
3Y*
19.55%
5Y*
9.62%
10Y*
9.67%
ALL TIME*
7.48%

HLFMX

1D
-0.53%
1M
0.96%
6M
-2.77%
YTD
5.94%
1Y
11.62%
3Y*
10.61%
5Y*
5.07%
10Y*
4.32%
ALL TIME*
1.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DFETX vs. HLFMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFETX
DFA Emerging Markets II Portfolio
19.35%33.54%6.86%13.11%-16.84%2.58%14.08%16.30%-13.47%36.75%
HLFMX
Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund
5.94%16.95%8.76%10.43%-18.91%10.18%0.11%10.88%-15.45%25.08%

Correlation

The correlation between DFETX and HLFMX is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2008

0.64

The correlation between DFETX and HLFMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFETX vs. HLFMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFETX
DFETX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
DFETX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFETX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFETX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DFETX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFETX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

HLFMX
HLFMX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
HLFMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLFMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLFMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
HLFMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLFMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFETX vs. HLFMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Emerging Markets II Portfolio (DFETX) and Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFETXHLFMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.19

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

1.09

+1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.49

2.68

+5.81

DFETX vs. HLFMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFETX Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is higher than the HLFMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFETX and HLFMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFETX vs. HLFMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFETX drawdown since its inception was -62.33%, roughly equal to the maximum HLFMX drawdown of -63.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFETX and HLFMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFETXHLFMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.33%

-63.95%

+1.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.30%

-11.09%

-3.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.13%

-11.79%

-4.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.48%

-28.37%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.20%

-46.61%

+6.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.44%

-3.76%

-5.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.62%

-19.13%

+3.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.31%

4.49%

-0.18%

Volatility

DFETX vs. HLFMX - Volatility Comparison

DFA Emerging Markets II Portfolio (DFETX) has a higher volatility of 9.36% compared to Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund (HLFMX) at 3.55%. This indicates that DFETX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLFMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFETXHLFMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.36%

3.55%

+5.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.43%

11.02%

+9.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.90%

12.40%

+9.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.92%

10.67%

+6.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.07%

11.95%

+5.12%

DFETX vs. HLFMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFETX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than HLFMX's 1.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFETX vs. HLFMX - Dividend Comparison

DFETX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.90%, more than HLFMX's 3.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFETX
DFA Emerging Markets II Portfolio
6.90%8.24%3.50%3.84%9.30%19.29%11.79%12.48%8.49%1.93%2.40%3.40%
HLFMX
Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund
3.36%3.56%1.88%1.77%2.28%0.83%1.61%1.97%1.34%1.90%1.01%1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFETX and HLFMX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFETX has higher volatility (9.36%) compared to HLFMX (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFETX dropped -62.33% vs HLFMX's -63.95%.

DFETX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFETX and HLFMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer