PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFESX vs. TRRJX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFESX vs. TRRJX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Investment Dimensions Group Inc - Emerging Markets Social Core Equity Portfolio (DFESX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFESX achieves a 27.87% return, which is significantly higher than TRRJX's 8.90% return. Over the past 10 years, DFESX has outperformed TRRJX with an annualized return of 11.05%, while TRRJX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.78% annualized return.


DFESX

1D
2.26%
1M
10.29%
YTD
27.87%
6M
30.65%
1Y
53.31%
3Y*
23.89%
5Y*
9.12%
10Y*
11.05%

TRRJX

1D
0.08%
1M
2.87%
YTD
8.90%
6M
4.95%
1Y
15.67%
3Y*
13.92%
5Y*
6.49%
10Y*
9.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFESX vs. TRRJX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFESX
DFA Investment Dimensions Group Inc - Emerging Markets Social Core Equity Portfolio
27.87%29.95%7.16%14.58%-18.49%4.16%12.99%17.12%-14.87%37.30%
TRRJX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund
8.90%10.96%11.99%18.14%-17.96%15.21%17.04%23.72%-6.95%20.89%

Correlation

The correlation between DFESX and TRRJX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012

0.75

The correlation between DFESX and TRRJX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFESX vs. TRRJX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFESX
DFESX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DFESX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFESX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFESX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
DFESX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFESX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

TRRJX
TRRJX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
TRRJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRRJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRRJX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
TRRJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRRJX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFESX vs. TRRJX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Investment Dimensions Group Inc - Emerging Markets Social Core Equity Portfolio (DFESX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFESXTRRJXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.37

1.59

+1.78

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.32

2.18

+2.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.31

+0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.16

1.95

+2.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.71

7.64

+9.07

DFESX vs. TRRJX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFESX Sharpe Ratio is 3.37, which is higher than the TRRJX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFESX and TRRJX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFESXTRRJXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.37

1.59

+1.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.51

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.73

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.50

-0.01

Drawdowns

DFESX vs. TRRJX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFESX drawdown since its inception was -41.43%, smaller than the maximum TRRJX drawdown of -53.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFESX and TRRJX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFESXTRRJXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.43%

-53.57%

+12.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.79%

-8.06%

-4.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.53%

-12.52%

-4.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.64%

-25.85%

-6.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.43%

-30.14%

-11.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.77%

-6.65%

-4.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

2.06%

+1.12%

Volatility

DFESX vs. TRRJX - Volatility Comparison

DFA Investment Dimensions Group Inc - Emerging Markets Social Core Equity Portfolio (DFESX) has a higher volatility of 7.18% compared to T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX) at 2.95%. This indicates that DFESX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRRJX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFESXTRRJXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.18%

2.95%

+4.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.25%

8.88%

+5.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.37%

10.46%

+5.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.09%

12.83%

+2.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.11%

13.54%

+2.57%

DFESX vs. TRRJX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFESX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than TRRJX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFESX vs. TRRJX - Dividend Comparison

DFESX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, while TRRJX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFESX
DFA Investment Dimensions Group Inc - Emerging Markets Social Core Equity Portfolio
2.15%2.59%3.15%3.23%3.17%2.37%1.64%2.33%2.37%2.04%2.05%2.17%
TRRJX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund
0.00%0.00%2.36%4.68%9.67%6.89%4.80%5.68%8.55%3.80%2.89%4.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFESX and TRRJX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFESX has higher volatility (7.18%) compared to TRRJX (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFESX dropped -41.43% vs TRRJX's -53.57%.

DFESX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.37 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFESX and TRRJX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer