PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFESX vs. TRLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFESX vs. TRLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Investment Dimensions Group Inc - Emerging Markets Social Core Equity Portfolio (DFESX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFESX achieves a 27.87% return, which is significantly higher than TRLGX's 6.07% return. Over the past 10 years, DFESX has underperformed TRLGX with an annualized return of 11.05%, while TRLGX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.55% annualized return.


DFESX

1D
2.26%
1M
10.29%
YTD
27.87%
6M
30.65%
1Y
53.31%
3Y*
23.89%
5Y*
9.12%
10Y*
11.05%

TRLGX

1D
1.05%
1M
5.86%
YTD
6.07%
6M
5.41%
1Y
22.46%
3Y*
25.77%
5Y*
12.84%
10Y*
18.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFESX vs. TRLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFESX
DFA Investment Dimensions Group Inc - Emerging Markets Social Core Equity Portfolio
27.87%29.95%7.16%14.58%-18.49%4.16%12.99%17.12%-14.87%37.30%
TRLGX
T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund
6.07%17.51%37.57%46.22%-35.26%23.24%39.57%28.51%4.35%37.77%

Correlation

The correlation between DFESX and TRLGX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012

0.62

The correlation between DFESX and TRLGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFESX vs. TRLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFESX
DFESX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DFESX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFESX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFESX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
DFESX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFESX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

TRLGX
TRLGX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
TRLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
TRLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFESX vs. TRLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Investment Dimensions Group Inc - Emerging Markets Social Core Equity Portfolio (DFESX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFESXTRLGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.37

1.51

+1.86

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.32

2.09

+2.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.27

+0.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.16

1.31

+2.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.71

4.15

+12.56

DFESX vs. TRLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFESX Sharpe Ratio is 3.37, which is higher than the TRLGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFESX and TRLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFESXTRLGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.37

1.51

+1.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.58

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.86

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.58

-0.09

Drawdowns

DFESX vs. TRLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFESX drawdown since its inception was -41.43%, smaller than the maximum TRLGX drawdown of -55.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFESX and TRLGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFESXTRLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.43%

-55.56%

+14.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.79%

-18.18%

+5.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.53%

-21.17%

+4.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.64%

-40.44%

+7.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.43%

-40.44%

-0.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.77%

-8.68%

-2.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

5.72%

-2.54%

Volatility

DFESX vs. TRLGX - Volatility Comparison

DFA Investment Dimensions Group Inc - Emerging Markets Social Core Equity Portfolio (DFESX) has a higher volatility of 7.18% compared to T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) at 3.06%. This indicates that DFESX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFESXTRLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.18%

3.06%

+4.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.25%

12.32%

+1.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.37%

15.59%

+0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.09%

22.38%

-7.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.11%

21.75%

-5.64%

DFESX vs. TRLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFESX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than TRLGX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFESX vs. TRLGX - Dividend Comparison

DFESX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, less than TRLGX's 12.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFESX
DFA Investment Dimensions Group Inc - Emerging Markets Social Core Equity Portfolio
2.15%2.59%3.15%3.23%3.17%2.37%1.64%2.33%2.37%2.04%2.05%2.17%
TRLGX
T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund
12.91%13.69%9.80%2.04%3.88%2.56%0.42%4.09%7.93%9.27%1.64%4.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFESX and TRLGX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFESX has higher volatility (7.18%) compared to TRLGX (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFESX dropped -41.43% vs TRLGX's -55.56%.

DFESX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.37 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFESX and TRLGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer