DFEOX vs. DFCMX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

DFEOX (DFA US Core Equity 1 Portfolio I) and DFCMX (DFA California Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio) are both mutual funds - DFEOX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Dimensional, while DFCMX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Dimensional. Over the past 10 years, DFEOX returned 14.27%/yr vs 1.16%/yr for DFCMX. Their -0.00 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. DFEOX charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for DFCMX.

Performance

DFEOX vs. DFCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA US Core Equity 1 Portfolio I (DFEOX) and DFA California Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFEOX achieves a 12.33% return, which is significantly higher than DFCMX's 1.14% return. Over the past 10 years, DFEOX has outperformed DFCMX with an annualized return of 14.27%, while DFCMX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.16% annualized return.

DFEOX

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 0.47%
• 6M: 8.75%
• YTD: 12.33%
• 1Y: 23.44%
• 3Y*: 18.32%
• 5Y*: 12.23%
• 10Y*: 14.27%
• ALL TIME*: 10.71%

DFCMX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.01%
• 6M: 0.72%
• YTD: 1.14%
• 1Y: 2.07%
• 3Y*: 2.58%
• 5Y*: 1.61%
• 10Y*: 1.16%
• ALL TIME*: 1.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DFCMX DFA California Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
DFEOX DFA US Core Equity 1 Portfolio I	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

DFEOX vs. DFCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DFEOX DFA US Core Equity 1 Portfolio I	12.33%	16.00%	21.35%	22.97%	-14.99%	27.51%	16.44%	30.20%	-7.81%	20.26%
DFCMX DFA California Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio	1.14%	2.55%	2.84%	2.53%	-0.76%	-0.13%	0.67%	1.84%	1.24%	1.07%

Correlation

The correlation between DFEOX and DFCMX is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.04
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.03
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.06
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012	-0.00

Return for Risk

DFEOX vs. DFCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFEOX

DFEOX Risk / Return Rank: 77
DFEOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
DFEOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
DFEOX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
DFEOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
DFEOX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

DFCMX

DFCMX Risk / Return Rank: 99
DFCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
DFCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
DFCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
DFCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
DFCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFEOX vs. DFCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA US Core Equity 1 Portfolio I (DFEOX) and DFA California Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFEOX	DFCMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	3.69	-1.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.56	7.60	-5.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	3.49	-2.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.63	10.66	-8.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.65	33.53	-21.88

DFEOX vs. DFCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFEOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is lower than the DFCMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFEOX and DFCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DFEOX vs. DFCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFEOX drawdown since its inception was -56.77%, which is greater than DFCMX's maximum drawdown of -2.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFEOX and DFCMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFEOX	DFCMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.77%	-2.20%	-54.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.28%	-0.20%	-8.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.24%	-0.68%	-18.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.86%	-2.13%	-20.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.55%	-2.20%	-34.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.49%	-0.09%	-0.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.14%	-0.25%	-6.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.87%	0.06%	+1.81%

Volatility

DFEOX vs. DFCMX - Volatility Comparison

DFA US Core Equity 1 Portfolio I (DFEOX) has a higher volatility of 2.95% compared to DFA California Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFCMX) at 0.22%. This indicates that DFEOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFEOX	DFCMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.95%	0.22%	+2.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.41%	0.40%	+9.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.03%	0.59%	+11.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.91%	0.89%	+16.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.96%	0.87%	+17.09%

DFEOX vs. DFCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFEOX has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than DFCMX's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DFEOX vs. DFCMX - Dividend Comparison

DFEOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than DFCMX's 2.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFCMX DFA California Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio	2.44%	2.23%	2.61%	1.70%	0.71%	0.36%	0.87%	1.43%	1.04%	0.87%	0.86%	0.82%
DFEOX DFA US Core Equity 1 Portfolio I	0.98%	1.06%	1.13%	1.43%	4.08%	3.69%	1.36%	3.02%	2.37%	1.61%	1.61%	2.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFEOX and DFCMX in my portfolio?

DFEOX and DFCMX have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFEOX or DFCMX?

DFEOX has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to DFCMX (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFEOX dropped -56.77% vs DFCMX's -2.20%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.69 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.