DFEN.DE vs. XDEM.DE
DFEN.DE (VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A) and XDEM.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - DFEN.DE is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the MarketVector Global Defense Industry Index, while XDEM.DE is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI World Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFEN.DE returned 37.43%/yr vs 26.00%/yr for XDEM.DE. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFEN.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDEM.DE.
Performance
DFEN.DE vs. XDEM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFEN.DE achieves a 3.04% return, which is significantly lower than XDEM.DE's 23.87% return.
DFEN.DE
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 2.28%
- YTD
- 3.04%
- 6M
- 4.46%
- 1Y
- 14.07%
- 3Y*
- 37.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDEM.DE
- 1D
- 3.40%
- 1M
- 5.13%
- YTD
- 23.87%
- 6M
- 25.57%
- 1Y
- 35.14%
- 3Y*
- 26.00%
- 5Y*
- 14.82%
- 10Y*
- 16.02%
DFEN.DE vs. XDEM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DFEN.DE VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A | 3.04% | 50.76% | 51.97% | 22.65% |
XDEM.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 23.87% | 8.09% | 38.22% | 10.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFEN.DE and XDEM.DE is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2023 | 0.53 |
The correlation between DFEN.DE and XDEM.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFEN.DE vs. XDEM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DFEN.DE
XDEM.DE
DFEN.DE vs. XDEM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A (DFEN.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFEN.DE | XDEM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.36 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 3.88 | -3.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.72 | 14.85 | -13.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFEN.DE vs. XDEM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFEN.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.88%, smaller than the maximum XDEM.DE drawdown of -30.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFEN.DE and XDEM.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFEN.DE | XDEM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.88% | -30.94% | +12.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.88% | -9.01% | -9.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.88% | -23.51% | +4.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.01% | -0.06% | -15.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.25% | -7.40% | +4.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.15% | 2.36% | +5.79% |
Volatility
DFEN.DE vs. XDEM.DE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A (DFEN.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.34% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE) at 6.76%. This indicates that DFEN.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFEN.DE | XDEM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.34% | 6.76% | +0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.34% | 14.92% | +4.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.01% | 17.48% | +7.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.22% | 17.42% | +3.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.22% | 18.11% | +3.11% |
DFEN.DE vs. XDEM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFEN.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEM.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFEN.DE vs. XDEM.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DFEN.DE nor XDEM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DFEN.DE and XDEM.DE have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDEM.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDEM.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for DFEN.DE.
DFEN.DE is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while XDEM.DE is Momentum. DFEN.DE tracks MarketVector Global Defense Industry Index, while XDEM.DE tracks MSCI World Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for DFEN.DE and 0.25% for XDEM.DE.
Find the right allocation for DFEN.DE and XDEM.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer