DFEN.DE vs. LCHM.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

DFEN.DE (VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A) and LCHM.DE (Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Chemicals UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - DFEN.DE is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the MarketVector Global Defense Industry Index, while LCHM.DE is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the STOXX® Europe 600 Chemicals. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DFEN.DE returned 14.03% vs 34.17% for LCHM.DE. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFEN.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for LCHM.DE.

Performance

DFEN.DE vs. LCHM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A (DFEN.DE) and Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Chemicals UCITS ETF Acc (LCHM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFEN.DE achieves a 4.02% return, which is significantly lower than LCHM.DE's 22.92% return.

DFEN.DE

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: -3.33%
• YTD: 4.02%
• 6M: 6.91%
• 1Y: 14.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LCHM.DE

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 6.36%
• YTD: 22.92%
• 6M: 27.91%
• 1Y: 34.17%
• 3Y*: 10.91%
• 5Y*: 6.53%
• 10Y*: 9.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFEN.DE vs. LCHM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DFEN.DE VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A	4.02%	50.76%	51.97%	8.67%
LCHM.DE Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Chemicals UCITS ETF Acc	22.92%	13.24%	-9.83%	10.89%

Correlation

The correlation between DFEN.DE and LCHM.DE is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2023	0.21

The correlation between DFEN.DE and LCHM.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DFEN.DE vs. LCHM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFEN.DE

DFEN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 19
DFEN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
DFEN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
DFEN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 18
DFEN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
DFEN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 18

LCHM.DE

LCHM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 55
LCHM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
LCHM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
LCHM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 52
LCHM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
LCHM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFEN.DE vs. LCHM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A (DFEN.DE) and Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Chemicals UCITS ETF Acc (LCHM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFEN.DE	LCHM.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.56	1.91	-1.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.97	2.62	-1.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.32	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.75	2.55	-1.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.81	10.41	-8.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DFEN.DE vs. LCHM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFEN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the LCHM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFEN.DE and LCHM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFEN.DE	LCHM.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56	1.91	-1.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.54	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.75	0.47	+1.29

Drawdowns

DFEN.DE vs. LCHM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFEN.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.60%, smaller than the maximum LCHM.DE drawdown of -47.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFEN.DE and LCHM.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFEN.DE	LCHM.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.60%	-47.72%	+29.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.60%	-13.34%	-5.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.12%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.60%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.17%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.21%	-1.74%	-13.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.27%	-8.36%	+5.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.72%	3.24%	+4.48%

Volatility

DFEN.DE vs. LCHM.DE - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A (DFEN.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.38% compared to Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Chemicals UCITS ETF Acc (LCHM.DE) at 6.63%. This indicates that DFEN.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCHM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFEN.DE	LCHM.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.38%	6.63%	+0.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.16%	14.76%	+4.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.79%	17.86%	+6.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.47%	17.73%	+3.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.47%	17.92%	+3.55%

DFEN.DE vs. LCHM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFEN.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than LCHM.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFEN.DE vs. LCHM.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither DFEN.DE nor LCHM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFEN.DE and LCHM.DE in my portfolio?

DFEN.DE and LCHM.DE have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DFEN.DE or LCHM.DE?

On fees, LCHM.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFEN.DE or LCHM.DE?

LCHM.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for DFEN.DE.

What is the main difference between DFEN.DE and LCHM.DE?

DFEN.DE is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while LCHM.DE is Industrials Equities. DFEN.DE tracks MarketVector Global Defense Industry Index, while LCHM.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Chemicals. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for DFEN.DE and 0.30% for LCHM.DE.