DFEN.DE vs. DBXD.DE
DFEN.DE (VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A) and DBXD.DE (Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - DFEN.DE is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the MarketVector Global Defense Industry Index, while DBXD.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the DAX®. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DFEN.DE returned 14.03% vs 2.31% for DBXD.DE. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFEN.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for DBXD.DE.
Performance
DFEN.DE vs. DBXD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFEN.DE achieves a 4.02% return, which is significantly higher than DBXD.DE's 1.35% return.
DFEN.DE
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -3.33%
- YTD
- 4.02%
- 6M
- 6.91%
- 1Y
- 14.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBXD.DE
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 2.02%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 3.97%
- 1Y
- 2.31%
- 3Y*
- 15.51%
- 5Y*
- 9.16%
- 10Y*
- 8.92%
DFEN.DE vs. DBXD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DFEN.DE VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A | 4.02% | 50.76% | 51.97% | 8.67% |
DBXD.DE Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C | 1.35% | 22.65% | 18.18% | 3.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFEN.DE and DBXD.DE is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2023 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFEN.DE vs. DBXD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DFEN.DE
DBXD.DE
DFEN.DE vs. DBXD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A (DFEN.DE) and Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (DBXD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFEN.DE | DBXD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.04 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 0.19 | +0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.81 | 0.58 | +1.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFEN.DE | DBXD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 | 0.14 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.75 | 0.31 | +1.44 |
Drawdowns
DFEN.DE vs. DBXD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFEN.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.60%, smaller than the maximum DBXD.DE drawdown of -54.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFEN.DE and DBXD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFEN.DE | DBXD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.60% | -54.98% | +36.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.60% | -12.28% | -6.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.21% | -2.23% | -12.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.27% | -11.34% | +8.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.72% | 3.97% | +3.75% |
Volatility
DFEN.DE vs. DBXD.DE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A (DFEN.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.38% compared to Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (DBXD.DE) at 5.10%. This indicates that DFEN.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBXD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFEN.DE | DBXD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.38% | 5.10% | +2.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.16% | 12.95% | +6.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.79% | 16.13% | +8.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.47% | 17.16% | +4.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.47% | 18.35% | +3.12% |
DFEN.DE vs. DBXD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFEN.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than DBXD.DE's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFEN.DE vs. DBXD.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DFEN.DE nor DBXD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DFEN.DE and DBXD.DE have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DBXD.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DBXD.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for DFEN.DE.
DFEN.DE is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while DBXD.DE is Europe Equities. DFEN.DE tracks MarketVector Global Defense Industry Index, while DBXD.DE tracks DAX®. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for DFEN.DE and 0.09% for DBXD.DE.
Find the right allocation for DFEN.DE and DBXD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer