PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFEMX vs. RYVFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFEMX vs. RYVFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Emerging Markets Portfolio (DFEMX) and Royce Small-Cap Value Fund (RYVFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFEMX achieves a 31.30% return, which is significantly higher than RYVFX's 16.86% return. Over the past 10 years, DFEMX has outperformed RYVFX with an annualized return of 11.51%, while RYVFX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.88% annualized return.


DFEMX

1D
1.02%
1M
10.69%
YTD
31.30%
6M
34.75%
1Y
60.80%
3Y*
25.98%
5Y*
10.30%
10Y*
11.51%

RYVFX

1D
0.53%
1M
3.93%
YTD
16.86%
6M
15.53%
1Y
36.94%
3Y*
16.71%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
8.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFEMX vs. RYVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFEMX
DFA Emerging Markets Portfolio
31.30%33.57%6.90%13.08%-16.91%2.53%13.89%16.02%-13.62%36.57%
RYVFX
Royce Small-Cap Value Fund
16.86%6.77%3.20%26.40%-10.18%28.15%-6.47%18.26%-7.37%4.93%

Correlation

The correlation between DFEMX and RYVFX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2002

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between DFEMX and RYVFX has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFEMX vs. RYVFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFEMX
DFEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
DFEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DFEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

RYVFX
RYVFX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
RYVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
RYVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFEMX vs. RYVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Emerging Markets Portfolio (DFEMX) and Royce Small-Cap Value Fund (RYVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFEMXRYVFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.39

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.82

4.32

+0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.39

11.39

+8.00

DFEMX vs. RYVFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFEMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.69, which is higher than the RYVFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFEMX and RYVFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFEMXRYVFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.69

2.26

+1.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.41

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.40

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.37

+0.04

Drawdowns

DFEMX vs. RYVFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFEMX drawdown since its inception was -62.43%, which is greater than RYVFX's maximum drawdown of -57.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFEMX and RYVFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFEMXRYVFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.43%

-57.72%

-4.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.85%

-9.17%

-3.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.12%

-28.20%

+12.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.84%

-28.20%

-3.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.44%

-48.56%

+8.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.34%

-9.80%

-5.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

3.47%

-0.30%

Volatility

DFEMX vs. RYVFX - Volatility Comparison

DFA Emerging Markets Portfolio (DFEMX) has a higher volatility of 7.55% compared to Royce Small-Cap Value Fund (RYVFX) at 4.34%. This indicates that DFEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFEMXRYVFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.55%

4.34%

+3.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.71%

11.07%

+3.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.80%

17.51%

-0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.69%

20.45%

-4.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.57%

22.48%

-5.91%

DFEMX vs. RYVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFEMX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than RYVFX's 1.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFEMX vs. RYVFX - Dividend Comparison

DFEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than RYVFX's 8.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFEMX
DFA Emerging Markets Portfolio
1.94%2.55%3.14%3.34%3.90%6.13%1.45%2.33%2.14%1.74%1.92%2.08%
RYVFX
Royce Small-Cap Value Fund
8.70%10.17%6.03%8.20%6.02%5.77%3.92%3.19%13.14%3.45%5.59%19.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFEMX and RYVFX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFEMX has higher volatility (7.55%) compared to RYVFX (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFEMX dropped -62.43% vs RYVFX's -57.72%.

DFEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.69 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFEMX and RYVFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer