DFCA vs. VTEB
DFCA (Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF) and VTEB (Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. DFCA is actively managed, while VTEB is passively managed. Over the past year, DFCA returned 5.05% vs 7.14% for VTEB. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFCA charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTEB.
Performance
DFCA vs. VTEB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFCA achieves a 1.07% return, which is significantly lower than VTEB's 1.46% return.
DFCA
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 1.07%
- 6M
- 1.46%
- 1Y
- 5.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTEB
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- 1Y
- 7.14%
- 3Y*
- 3.57%
- 5Y*
- 0.88%
- 10Y*
- 2.09%
DFCA vs. VTEB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DFCA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF | 1.07% | 2.99% | 1.49% | 2.59% |
VTEB Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 1.46% | 3.72% | 1.31% | 3.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFCA and VTEB is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2023 | 0.78 |
The correlation between DFCA and VTEB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFCA vs. VTEB — Risk / Return Rank
DFCA
VTEB
DFCA vs. VTEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF (DFCA) and Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFCA | VTEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.58 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | 2.65 | +0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.29 | 9.41 | -0.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFCA | VTEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.87 | 2.64 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.13 | 0.47 | +0.65 |
Drawdowns
DFCA vs. VTEB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFCA drawdown since its inception was -3.28%, smaller than the maximum VTEB drawdown of -17.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFCA and VTEB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFCA | VTEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.28% | -17.00% | +13.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.77% | -2.71% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -12.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.52% | -0.52% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.70% | -2.33% | +1.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.55% | 0.76% | -0.21% |
Volatility
DFCA vs. VTEB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF (DFCA) is 0.55%, while Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEB) has a volatility of 0.89%. This indicates that DFCA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFCA | VTEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.55% | 0.89% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.30% | 2.01% | -0.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.77% | 2.72% | -0.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.48% | 3.90% | -1.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.48% | 5.26% | -2.78% |
DFCA vs. VTEB - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFCA has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VTEB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFCA vs. VTEB - Dividend Comparison
DFCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, less than VTEB's 3.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFCA Dimensional California Municipal Bond ETF | 2.69% | 2.86% | 2.86% | 1.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTEB Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 3.35% | 3.29% | 3.14% | 2.79% | 2.09% | 1.64% | 1.99% | 2.30% | 2.25% | 1.96% | 1.66% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFCA and VTEB have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTEB has higher volatility (0.89%) compared to DFCA (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFCA dropped -3.28% vs VTEB's -17.00%.
On 1-year performance, VTEB leads with 7.14% vs 5.05% for DFCA. On fees, VTEB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, DFCA has been the lower-risk option at 0.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VTEB has performed better with a 7.14% return vs 5.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTEB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for DFCA.
VTEB has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 2.69% for DFCA.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for DFCA and 0.03% for VTEB.
DFCA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFCA and VTEB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer