DFAW vs. VOLT

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

DFAW (Dimensional World Equity ETF) and VOLT (Tema Electrification ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DFAW returned 27.45% vs 40.13% for VOLT. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DFAW charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for VOLT.

Performance

DFAW vs. VOLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional World Equity ETF (DFAW) and Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAW achieves a 14.45% return, which is significantly lower than VOLT's 30.27% return.

DFAW

• 1D: 1.40%
• 1M: 1.61%
• 6M: 9.82%
• YTD: 14.45%
• 1Y: 27.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 22.35%

VOLT

• 1D: 1.54%
• 1M: -3.80%
• 6M: 15.87%
• YTD: 30.27%
• 1Y: 40.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 27.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DFAW Dimensional World Equity ETF	$6.19M	$6.32M	$7.79M
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF	$11.23M	$11.22M	$15.49M

DFAW vs. VOLT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DFAW Dimensional World Equity ETF	14.45%	20.62%	-4.24%
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF	30.27%	25.92%	-8.98%

Correlation

The correlation between DFAW and VOLT is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024	0.72

The correlation between DFAW and VOLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFAW vs. VOLT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DFAW	VOLT
Technology	26.3%	14.1%
Financial Services	15.7%	0.5%
Industrials	13.7%	50.4%
Consumer Cyclical	9.9%	2.6%
Healthcare	8.7%	-
Communication Services	6.4%	-
Energy	5.1%	4.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	-
Basic Materials	4.8%	1.4%
Real Estate	2.3%	-
Utilities	2.2%	28.2%

Return for Risk

DFAW vs. VOLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFAW

DFAW Risk / Return Rank: 86
DFAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
DFAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
DFAW Omega Ratio Rank: 87
DFAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
DFAW Martin Ratio Rank: 88

VOLT

VOLT Risk / Return Rank: 67
VOLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
VOLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
VOLT Omega Ratio Rank: 64
VOLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
VOLT Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFAW vs. VOLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional World Equity ETF (DFAW) and Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFAW	VOLT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	1.65	+0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.95	2.20	+0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.28	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.10	2.34	+0.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.38	8.84	+4.54

DFAW vs. VOLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAW Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the VOLT Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAW and VOLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DFAW vs. VOLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAW drawdown since its inception was -16.93%, smaller than the maximum VOLT drawdown of -23.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAW and VOLT.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFAW	VOLT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.93%	-23.40%	+6.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.88%	-17.22%	+8.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-10.39%	+10.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.67%	-5.35%	+3.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.06%	4.55%	-2.49%

Volatility

DFAW vs. VOLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional World Equity ETF (DFAW) is 3.60%, while Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) has a volatility of 9.72%. This indicates that DFAW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFAW	VOLT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.60%	9.72%	-6.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.52%	21.11%	-10.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.88%	24.49%	-11.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.46%	25.46%	-11.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.46%	25.46%	-11.00%

DFAW vs. VOLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than VOLT's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFAW vs. VOLT - Dividend Comparison

DFAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, more than VOLT's 0.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DFAW Dimensional World Equity ETF	1.55%	1.71%	1.47%	0.42%
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF	0.35%	0.46%	0.01%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFAW and VOLT in my portfolio?

DFAW and VOLT have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFAW or VOLT?

VOLT has higher volatility (9.72%) compared to DFAW (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAW dropped -16.93% vs VOLT's -23.40%.

Which ETF is better, DFAW or VOLT?

On 1-year performance, VOLT leads with 40.13% vs 27.45% for DFAW. On fees, DFAW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, DFAW has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFAW or VOLT?

Over the 1-year period, VOLT has performed better with a 40.13% return vs 27.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFAW or VOLT?

DFAW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for VOLT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFAW or VOLT?

DFAW has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 0.35% for VOLT.

What is the main difference between DFAW and VOLT?

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Tema. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for DFAW and 0.75% for VOLT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.