PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFAW vs. IMFL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DFAW vs. IMFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional World Equity ETF (DFAW) and Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DFAW vs. IMFL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DFAW
Dimensional World Equity ETF
-0.05%20.62%15.49%11.57%
IMFL
Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF
7.24%30.89%-3.57%10.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAW achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly lower than IMFL's 7.24% return.


DFAW

1D
2.97%
1M
-5.96%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
3.63%
1Y
22.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IMFL

1D
3.30%
1M
-8.04%
YTD
7.24%
6M
16.45%
1Y
33.09%
3Y*
14.53%
5Y*
7.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DFAW vs. IMFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IMFL's 0.34% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DFAW vs. IMFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAW
DFAW Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
DFAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAW Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAW Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

IMFL
IMFL Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
IMFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMFL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
IMFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMFL Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAW vs. IMFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional World Equity ETF (DFAW) and Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFAWIMFLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.32

2.00

-0.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.94

2.61

-0.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.38

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

2.69

-0.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.04

10.54

-1.50

DFAW vs. IMFL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAW Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the IMFL Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAW and IMFL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFAWIMFLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

2.00

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.33

0.53

+0.80

Correlation

The correlation between DFAW and IMFL is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

DFAW vs. IMFL - Dividend Comparison

DFAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, less than IMFL's 3.15% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
DFAW
Dimensional World Equity ETF
1.74%1.71%1.47%0.42%0.00%0.00%
IMFL
Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF
3.15%2.88%3.56%3.85%3.35%3.94%

Drawdowns

DFAW vs. IMFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAW drawdown since its inception was -16.93%, smaller than the maximum IMFL drawdown of -33.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAW and IMFL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DFAWIMFLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.93%

-33.26%

+16.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.24%

-11.77%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.17%

-8.70%

+2.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.75%

-7.37%

+5.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

3.00%

-0.46%

Volatility

DFAW vs. IMFL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional World Equity ETF (DFAW) is 5.75%, while Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL) has a volatility of 7.94%. This indicates that DFAW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DFAWIMFLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.75%

7.94%

-2.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.45%

11.84%

-2.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.14%

16.63%

+0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.57%

15.89%

-1.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.57%

15.86%

-1.29%