DFAW vs. FXAIX
DFAW (Dimensional World Equity ETF) and FXAIX (Fidelity 500 Index Fund) are both funds - DFAW is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while FXAIX is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. DFAW is actively managed, while FXAIX is passively managed. Over the past year, DFAW returned 30.13% vs 28.99% for FXAIX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFAW charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for FXAIX.
Performance
DFAW vs. FXAIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFAW achieves a 12.61% return, which is significantly higher than FXAIX's 11.71% return.
DFAW
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 4.36%
- YTD
- 12.61%
- 6M
- 13.91%
- 1Y
- 30.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FXAIX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 5.80%
- YTD
- 11.71%
- 6M
- 11.74%
- 1Y
- 28.99%
- 3Y*
- 22.75%
- 5Y*
- 14.28%
- 10Y*
- 15.66%
DFAW vs. FXAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAW Dimensional World Equity ETF | 12.61% | 20.62% | 15.49% | 11.57% |
FXAIX Fidelity 500 Index Fund | 11.71% | 17.84% | 25.01% | 12.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAW and FXAIX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023 | 0.92 |
The correlation between DFAW and FXAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFAW vs. FXAIX — Risk / Return Rank
DFAW
FXAIX
DFAW vs. FXAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional World Equity ETF (DFAW) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFAW | FXAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.46 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | 3.36 | +0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.09 | 15.70 | -0.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFAW | FXAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | 2.52 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.62 | 0.82 | +0.79 |
Drawdowns
DFAW vs. FXAIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAW drawdown since its inception was -16.93%, smaller than the maximum FXAIX drawdown of -33.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAW and FXAIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFAW | FXAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.93% | -33.79% | +16.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.88% | -8.89% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | 0.00% | -0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.70% | -3.79% | +2.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 1.90% | +0.10% |
Volatility
DFAW vs. FXAIX - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional World Equity ETF (DFAW) has a higher volatility of 3.35% compared to Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) at 2.83%. This indicates that DFAW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFAW | FXAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.35% | 2.83% | +0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.39% | 8.97% | +0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.03% | 11.86% | +0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.46% | 16.91% | -2.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.46% | 18.07% | -3.61% |
DFAW vs. FXAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FXAIX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFAW vs. FXAIX - Dividend Comparison
DFAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, more than FXAIX's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAW Dimensional World Equity ETF | 1.55% | 1.71% | 1.47% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FXAIX Fidelity 500 Index Fund | 1.03% | 1.11% | 1.25% | 1.45% | 1.69% | 1.22% | 1.60% | 2.06% | 2.72% | 1.97% | 2.52% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, DFAW and FXAIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DFAW has higher volatility (3.35%) compared to FXAIX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAW dropped -16.93% vs FXAIX's -33.79%.
FXAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFAW and FXAIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer