DFAW vs. FIXT

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

DFAW (Dimensional World Equity ETF) and FIXT (Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF) are both Global Equities funds. DFAW is actively managed, while FIXT is passively managed. Over the past year, DFAW returned 26.80% vs 5.06% for FIXT. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFAW charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FIXT.

Performance

DFAW vs. FIXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional World Equity ETF (DFAW) and Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAW achieves a 11.73% return, which is significantly higher than FIXT's 1.30% return.

DFAW

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: -0.54%
• YTD: 11.73%
• 6M: 10.59%
• 1Y: 26.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FIXT

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 1.31%
• YTD: 1.30%
• 6M: 1.03%
• 1Y: 5.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFAW vs. FIXT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DFAW Dimensional World Equity ETF	11.73%	15.36%
FIXT Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF	1.30%	4.57%

Correlation

The correlation between DFAW and FIXT is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2025	0.37

DFAW vs. FIXT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DFAW	FIXT
Technology	27.0%	-
Financial Services	14.8%	-
Industrials	13.4%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	-
Healthcare	8.0%	100.0%
Communication Services	7.0%	-
Energy	5.5%	-
Basic Materials	5.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	-
Real Estate	2.3%	-
Utilities	2.2%	-

Return for Risk

DFAW vs. FIXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAW

DFAW Risk / Return Rank: 75
DFAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
DFAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
DFAW Omega Ratio Rank: 76
DFAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
DFAW Martin Ratio Rank: 79

FIXT

FIXT Risk / Return Rank: 39
FIXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
FIXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
FIXT Omega Ratio Rank: 40
FIXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FIXT Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAW vs. FIXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional World Equity ETF (DFAW) and Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFAW	FIXT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	1.35	+0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.91	2.03	+0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.24	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	1.68	+1.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.14	4.66	+8.47

DFAW vs. FIXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAW Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the FIXT Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAW and FIXT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DFAW vs. FIXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAW drawdown since its inception was -16.93%, which is greater than FIXT's maximum drawdown of -3.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAW and FIXT.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFAW	FIXT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.93%	-3.02%	-13.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.88%	-3.02%	-5.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.60%	-0.84%	-0.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.70%	-0.76%	-0.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.05%	1.09%	+0.96%

Volatility

DFAW vs. FIXT - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional World Equity ETF (DFAW) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT) at 0.97%. This indicates that DFAW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFAW	FIXT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.93%	0.97%	+3.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.34%	2.52%	+7.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.69%	3.76%	+8.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.57%	3.76%	+10.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.57%	3.76%	+10.81%

DFAW vs. FIXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FIXT's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFAW vs. FIXT - Dividend Comparison

DFAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than FIXT's 5.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DFAW Dimensional World Equity ETF	1.58%	1.71%	1.47%	0.42%
FIXT Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF	5.49%	3.24%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFAW and FIXT in my portfolio?

DFAW and FIXT have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFAW or FIXT?

DFAW has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to FIXT (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAW dropped -16.93% vs FIXT's -3.02%.

Which ETF is better, DFAW or FIXT?

On 1-year performance, DFAW leads with 26.80% vs 5.06% for FIXT. On fees, DFAW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FIXT has been the lower-risk option at 0.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFAW or FIXT?

Over the 1-year period, DFAW has performed better with a 26.80% return vs 5.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFAW or FIXT?

DFAW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FIXT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFAW or FIXT?

FIXT has the higher dividend yield at 5.49%, compared with 1.58% for DFAW.

What is the main difference between DFAW and FIXT?

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Procure. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for DFAW and 0.75% for FIXT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.