DFAW vs. DSHGX
DFAW (Dimensional World Equity ETF) and DSHGX (DFA Selectively Hedged Global Equity Portfolio) are both Global Equities funds from Dimensional. Over the past year, DFAW returned 30.13% vs 33.12% for DSHGX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DFAW charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for DSHGX.
Performance
DFAW vs. DSHGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFAW achieves a 12.61% return, which is significantly lower than DSHGX's 14.60% return.
DFAW
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 4.36%
- YTD
- 12.61%
- 6M
- 13.91%
- 1Y
- 30.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DSHGX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 5.38%
- YTD
- 14.60%
- 6M
- 15.82%
- 1Y
- 33.12%
- 3Y*
- 21.38%
- 5Y*
- 12.23%
- 10Y*
- 12.94%
DFAW vs. DSHGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAW Dimensional World Equity ETF | 12.61% | 20.62% | 15.49% | 11.57% |
DSHGX DFA Selectively Hedged Global Equity Portfolio | 14.60% | 21.42% | 15.89% | 10.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAW and DSHGX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023 | 0.97 |
The correlation between DFAW and DSHGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFAW vs. DSHGX — Risk / Return Rank
DFAW
DSHGX
DFAW vs. DSHGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional World Equity ETF (DFAW) and DFA Selectively Hedged Global Equity Portfolio (DSHGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFAW | DSHGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.56 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | 3.83 | -0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.09 | 16.67 | -1.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFAW | DSHGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | 3.03 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.62 | 0.77 | +0.85 |
Drawdowns
DFAW vs. DSHGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAW drawdown since its inception was -16.93%, smaller than the maximum DSHGX drawdown of -36.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAW and DSHGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFAW | DSHGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.93% | -36.15% | +19.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.88% | -8.93% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | 0.00% | -0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.70% | -4.49% | +2.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 2.04% | -0.04% |
Volatility
DFAW vs. DSHGX - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional World Equity ETF (DFAW) and DFA Selectively Hedged Global Equity Portfolio (DSHGX) have volatilities of 3.35% and 3.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFAW | DSHGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.35% | 3.47% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.39% | 9.16% | +0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.03% | 11.30% | +0.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.46% | 14.58% | -0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.46% | 16.06% | -1.60% |
DFAW vs. DSHGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DSHGX's 0.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFAW vs. DSHGX - Dividend Comparison
DFAW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than DSHGX's 2.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAW Dimensional World Equity ETF | 1.55% | 1.71% | 1.47% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DSHGX DFA Selectively Hedged Global Equity Portfolio | 2.79% | 3.20% | 5.56% | 6.18% | 9.61% | 6.56% | 2.10% | 2.50% | 4.62% | 1.11% | 3.07% | 3.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, DFAW and DSHGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DSHGX has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to DFAW (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAW dropped -16.93% vs DSHGX's -36.15%.
DSHGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFAW and DSHGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer