DFAS vs. SCDS
DFAS (Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF) and SCDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DFAS returned 31.21% vs 48.53% for SCDS. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DFAS charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for SCDS.
Performance
DFAS vs. SCDS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFAS achieves a 15.74% return, which is significantly lower than SCDS's 27.90% return.
DFAS
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 15.74%
- 6M
- 12.99%
- 1Y
- 31.21%
- 3Y*
- 16.27%
- 5Y*
- 8.37%
- 10Y*
- —
SCDS
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- 5.98%
- YTD
- 27.90%
- 6M
- 24.54%
- 1Y
- 48.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFAS vs. SCDS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DFAS Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF | 15.74% | 8.17% | 10.41% |
SCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF | 27.90% | 11.27% | 7.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAS and SCDS is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2024 | 0.96 |
The correlation between DFAS and SCDS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFAS vs. SCDS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFAS
SCDS
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
DFAS
SCDS
Industrials
DFAS
SCDS
Technology
DFAS
SCDS
Consumer Cyclical
DFAS
SCDS
Healthcare
DFAS
SCDS
Energy
DFAS
SCDS
Basic Materials
DFAS
SCDS
Consumer Defensive
DFAS
SCDS
Utilities
DFAS
SCDS
Communication Services
DFAS
SCDS
Real Estate
DFAS
SCDS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFAS vs. SCDS — Risk / Return Rank
DFAS
SCDS
DFAS vs. SCDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFAS | SCDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.44 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | 5.51 | -2.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.51 | 19.13 | -7.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFAS vs. SCDS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAS drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, roughly equal to the maximum SCDS drawdown of -26.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAS and SCDS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFAS | SCDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.13% | -26.71% | +0.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -8.85% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | 0.00% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.24% | -5.16% | -3.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 2.54% | +0.18% |
Volatility
DFAS vs. SCDS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) is 4.70%, while JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) has a volatility of 6.04%. This indicates that DFAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFAS | SCDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.70% | 6.04% | -1.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.92% | 13.57% | -1.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.00% | 18.67% | -1.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.81% | 21.26% | -0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.82% | 21.26% | -0.44% |
DFAS vs. SCDS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAS has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than SCDS's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFAS vs. SCDS - Dividend Comparison
DFAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, more than SCDS's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAS Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF | 0.90% | 0.99% | 0.93% | 1.00% | 1.03% | 2.87% |
SCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF | 0.88% | 1.15% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, DFAS and SCDS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCDS has higher volatility (6.04%) compared to DFAS (4.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAS dropped -26.13% vs SCDS's -26.71%.
On 1-year performance, SCDS leads with 48.53% vs 31.21% for DFAS. On fees, DFAS is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, DFAS has been the lower-risk option at 4.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SCDS has performed better with a 48.53% return vs 31.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFAS is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SCDS.
DFAS has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.88% for SCDS.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for DFAS and 0.40% for SCDS.
SCDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFAS and SCDS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer