DFAS vs. RYPRX
DFAS (Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF) and RYPRX (Royce Premier Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, DFAS returned 15.22%/yr vs 12.24%/yr for RYPRX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFAS charges 0.34%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for RYPRX.
Performance
DFAS vs. RYPRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFAS achieves a 12.81% return, which is significantly lower than RYPRX's 15.73% return.
DFAS
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 2.19%
- YTD
- 12.81%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 27.65%
- 3Y*
- 15.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RYPRX
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- 15.73%
- 6M
- 15.18%
- 1Y
- 26.55%
- 3Y*
- 12.24%
- 5Y*
- 6.50%
- 10Y*
- 11.04%
DFAS vs. RYPRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAS Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF | 12.81% | 8.17% | 10.21% | 17.83% | -13.84% | 4.94% |
RYPRX Royce Premier Fund | 15.73% | 5.74% | 2.91% | 22.76% | -15.67% | 5.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAS and RYPRX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2021 | 0.95 |
The correlation between DFAS and RYPRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFAS vs. RYPRX — Risk / Return Rank
DFAS
RYPRX
DFAS vs. RYPRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) and Royce Premier Fund (RYPRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFAS | RYPRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.27 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | 1.99 | +0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.17 | 6.41 | +3.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFAS | RYPRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 1.58 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.60 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
DFAS vs. RYPRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAS drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, smaller than the maximum RYPRX drawdown of -51.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAS and RYPRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFAS | RYPRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.13% | -51.47% | +25.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -14.54% | +5.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.13% | -26.14% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -2.61% | +1.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.31% | -6.27% | -2.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 4.50% | -1.77% |
Volatility
DFAS vs. RYPRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) is 4.31%, while Royce Premier Fund (RYPRX) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that DFAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYPRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFAS | RYPRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 5.29% | -0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.58% | 13.63% | -2.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.77% | 18.29% | -1.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.84% | 19.91% | +0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.84% | 21.30% | -0.46% |
DFAS vs. RYPRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAS has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than RYPRX's 1.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFAS vs. RYPRX - Dividend Comparison
DFAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than RYPRX's 10.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAS Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF | 0.92% | 0.99% | 0.93% | 1.00% | 1.03% | 2.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RYPRX Royce Premier Fund | 10.41% | 12.05% | 9.52% | 6.89% | 9.00% | 21.23% | 5.55% | 20.68% | 29.26% | 15.18% | 13.42% | 24.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, DFAS and RYPRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
RYPRX has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to DFAS (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAS dropped -26.13% vs RYPRX's -51.47%.
DFAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFAS and RYPRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer