DFAS vs. CGMM

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) and Capital Group U.S. Small and Mid Cap ETF (CGMM).

DFAS and CGMM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DFAS is an actively managed fund by Dimensional. It was launched on Jun 14, 2021. CGMM is an actively managed fund by Capital Group. It was launched on Jan 14, 2025.

Performance

DFAS vs. CGMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) and Capital Group U.S. Small and Mid Cap ETF (CGMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DFAS vs. CGMM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DFAS Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF	2.90%	5.43%
CGMM Capital Group U.S. Small and Mid Cap ETF	2.60%	11.46%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAS achieves a 2.90% return, which is significantly higher than CGMM's 2.60% return.

DFAS

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: -4.81%
• YTD: 2.90%
• 6M: 4.70%
• 1Y: 20.43%
• 3Y*: 11.87%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CGMM

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: -5.79%
• YTD: 2.60%
• 6M: 4.81%
• 1Y: 23.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFAS vs. CGMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAS has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than CGMM's 0.51% expense ratio.

CGMM

Capital Group U.S. Small and Mid Cap ETF

DFAS

Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF

Return for Risk

DFAS vs. CGMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAS

DFAS Risk / Return Rank: 53
DFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
DFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
DFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 48
DFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
DFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 57

CGMM

CGMM Risk / Return Rank: 62
CGMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
CGMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
CGMM Omega Ratio Rank: 58
CGMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
CGMM Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAS vs. CGMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) and Capital Group U.S. Small and Mid Cap ETF (CGMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFAS	CGMM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.93	1.11	-0.18
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.45	1.66	-0.21
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.23	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.49	1.74	-0.25
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.89	7.36	-1.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DFAS vs. CGMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAS Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is comparable to the CGMM Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAS and CGMM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFAS	CGMM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93	1.11	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.57	-0.29

Correlation

The correlation between DFAS and CGMM is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

DFAS vs. CGMM - Dividend Comparison

DFAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than CGMM's 0.39% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DFAS Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF	1.01%	0.99%	0.93%	1.00%	1.03%	2.87%
CGMM Capital Group U.S. Small and Mid Cap ETF	0.39%	0.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

DFAS vs. CGMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAS drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, which is greater than CGMM's maximum drawdown of -21.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAS and CGMM.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFAS	CGMM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.13%	-21.04%	-5.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.08%	-13.98%	-0.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.16%	-6.39%	+0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.55%	-3.43%	-5.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.56%	3.31%	+0.25%

Volatility

DFAS vs. CGMM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) is 6.17%, while Capital Group U.S. Small and Mid Cap ETF (CGMM) has a volatility of 6.85%. This indicates that DFAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFAS	CGMM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.17%	6.85%	-0.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.68%	12.39%	+0.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.96%	21.57%	+0.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.02%	21.00%	+0.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.02%	21.00%	+0.02%