PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFAE vs. DFAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DFAE vs. DFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF (DFAE) and Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DFAE vs. DFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DFAE
Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF
4.12%31.48%7.68%12.63%-17.52%-6.78%
DFAS
Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF
2.33%8.17%10.21%17.83%-13.84%4.94%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAE achieves a 4.12% return, which is significantly higher than DFAS's 2.33% return.


DFAE

1D
3.52%
1M
-8.86%
YTD
4.12%
6M
8.25%
1Y
33.86%
3Y*
16.49%
5Y*
6.10%
10Y*

DFAS

1D
2.80%
1M
-5.04%
YTD
2.33%
6M
4.44%
1Y
20.32%
3Y*
11.67%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DFAE vs. DFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAS's 0.34% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DFAE vs. DFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAE
DFAE Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DFAE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAE Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAS
DFAS Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
DFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAE vs. DFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF (DFAE) and Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFAEDFASDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.76

0.93

+0.83

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.35

1.45

+0.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.19

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

1.45

+1.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.09

5.76

+4.32

DFAE vs. DFAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAE Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the DFAS Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAE and DFAS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFAEDFASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

0.93

+0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.27

+0.18

Correlation

The correlation between DFAE and DFAS is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

DFAE vs. DFAS - Dividend Comparison

DFAE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, more than DFAS's 1.02% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
DFAE
Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF
2.11%2.20%2.35%2.43%2.85%1.63%0.01%
DFAS
Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF
1.02%0.99%0.93%1.00%1.03%2.87%0.00%

Drawdowns

DFAE vs. DFAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAE drawdown since its inception was -32.21%, which is greater than DFAS's maximum drawdown of -26.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAE and DFAS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DFAEDFASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.21%

-26.13%

-6.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.80%

-14.08%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.73%

-6.67%

-3.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.59%

-8.55%

-2.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

3.54%

-0.23%

Volatility

DFAE vs. DFAS - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF (DFAE) has a higher volatility of 10.23% compared to Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) at 6.21%. This indicates that DFAE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DFAEDFASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.23%

6.21%

+4.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.31%

12.67%

+1.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.37%

21.96%

-2.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.36%

21.03%

-3.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.50%

21.03%

-3.53%