DFABX vs. NRK
DFABX (DFA Short-Term Selective State Municipal Bond Portfolio) and NRK (Nuveen New York AMT Free Quality Municipal Income) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, DFABX returned 2.82%/yr vs 8.40%/yr for NRK. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFABX charges 0.25%/yr vs 2.16%/yr for NRK.
Performance
DFABX vs. NRK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFABX achieves a 0.98% return, which is significantly lower than NRK's 8.40% return.
DFABX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.98%
- 6M
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 2.66%
- 3Y*
- 2.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NRK
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 8.40%
- 6M
- 8.61%
- 1Y
- 17.19%
- 3Y*
- 8.40%
- 5Y*
- 0.30%
- 10Y*
- 2.45%
DFABX vs. NRK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFABX DFA Short-Term Selective State Municipal Bond Portfolio | 0.98% | 2.46% | 2.90% | 2.87% | 0.55% |
NRK Nuveen New York AMT Free Quality Municipal Income | 8.40% | 4.74% | 5.93% | 7.03% | -7.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFABX and NRK is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2022 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFABX vs. NRK — Risk / Return Rank
DFABX
NRK
DFABX vs. NRK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Short-Term Selective State Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFABX) and Nuveen New York AMT Free Quality Municipal Income (NRK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFABX | NRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.77 | 2.12 | +2.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 12.57 | 3.53 | +9.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 6.47 | 1.42 | +5.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 24.98 | 3.19 | +21.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 108.37 | 8.56 | +99.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFABX | NRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.77 | 2.12 | +2.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.48 | 0.30 | +2.17 |
Drawdowns
DFABX vs. NRK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFABX drawdown since its inception was -2.46%, smaller than the maximum NRK drawdown of -40.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFABX and NRK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFABX | NRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.46% | -40.18% | +37.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.11% | -5.32% | +5.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.60% | -12.67% | +12.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.18% | +2.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.24% | -8.19% | +7.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | 1.98% | -1.96% |
Volatility
DFABX vs. NRK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DFA Short-Term Selective State Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFABX) is 0.20%, while Nuveen New York AMT Free Quality Municipal Income (NRK) has a volatility of 3.09%. This indicates that DFABX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFABX | NRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.20% | 3.09% | -2.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.42% | 6.25% | -5.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56% | 8.14% | -7.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.96% | 9.88% | -8.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.96% | 10.32% | -9.36% |
DFABX vs. NRK - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFABX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than NRK's 2.16% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFABX vs. NRK - Dividend Comparison
DFABX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, less than NRK's 7.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFABX DFA Short-Term Selective State Municipal Bond Portfolio | 2.63% | 2.33% | 2.86% | 2.52% | 1.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NRK Nuveen New York AMT Free Quality Municipal Income | 7.83% | 8.21% | 6.74% | 4.06% | 5.41% | 4.18% | 4.15% | 3.98% | 4.68% | 4.85% | 5.37% | 5.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFABX and NRK have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NRK has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to DFABX (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFABX dropped -2.46% vs NRK's -40.18%.
DFABX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.77 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFABX and NRK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer