DEXC vs. DFSV

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

DEXC (Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF) and DFSV (Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DEXC is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while DFSV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DEXC returned 39.06% vs 37.95% for DFSV. Their 0.50 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DEXC charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for DFSV.

Performance

DEXC vs. DFSV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF (DEXC) and Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF (DFSV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DEXC having a 22.11% return and DFSV slightly lower at 21.42%.

DEXC

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -6.85%
• 6M: 13.02%
• YTD: 22.11%
• 1Y: 39.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 28.12%

DFSV

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.56%
• 6M: 13.68%
• YTD: 21.42%
• 1Y: 37.95%
• 3Y*: 14.56%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DEXC Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF	$1.25M	$1.39M	$1.60M
DFSV Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF	$29.48M	$29.48M	$35.45M

DEXC vs. DFSV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DEXC Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF	22.11%	27.13%	-1.63%
DFSV Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF	21.42%	8.59%	-5.47%

Correlation

The correlation between DEXC and DFSV is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2024	0.50

The correlation between DEXC and DFSV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

DEXC vs. DFSV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DEXC	DFSV
Technology	48.1%	7.8%
Financial Services	14.7%	28.5%
Industrials	9.3%	16.1%
Basic Materials	6.5%	4.7%
Consumer Cyclical	5.9%	14.9%
Communication Services	3.2%	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	3.1%	5.6%
Energy	3.1%	11.1%
Healthcare	2.8%	7.3%
Utilities	1.9%	0.6%
Real Estate	1.4%	0.9%

Return for Risk

DEXC vs. DFSV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DEXC

DEXC Risk / Return Rank: 64
DEXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
DEXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
DEXC Omega Ratio Rank: 69
DEXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
DEXC Martin Ratio Rank: 67

DFSV

DFSV Risk / Return Rank: 88
DFSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
DFSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
DFSV Omega Ratio Rank: 86
DFSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
DFSV Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DEXC vs. DFSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF (DEXC) and Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF (DFSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DEXC	DFSV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	2.10	-0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	3.06	-1.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.38	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.12	3.75	-1.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.09	12.62	-4.52

DEXC vs. DFSV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEXC Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the DFSV Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEXC and DFSV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DEXC vs. DFSV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEXC drawdown since its inception was -18.31%, smaller than the maximum DFSV drawdown of -28.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEXC and DFSV.

Drawdown Indicators

	DEXC	DFSV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.31%	-28.02%	+9.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.31%	-9.39%	-8.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-28.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.30%	-0.75%	-13.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.92%	-6.49%	+3.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.79%	2.79%	+2.00%

Volatility

DEXC vs. DFSV - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF (DEXC) has a higher volatility of 10.08% compared to Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF (DFSV) at 3.40%. This indicates that DEXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DEXC	DFSV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.08%	3.40%	+6.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.42%	10.52%	+13.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.90%	16.87%	+9.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.68%	21.98%	+0.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.68%	21.98%	+0.70%

DEXC vs. DFSV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEXC has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than DFSV's 0.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

DEXC vs. DFSV - Dividend Comparison

DEXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than DFSV's 1.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DEXC Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF	1.67%	1.97%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%
DFSV Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF	1.35%	1.53%	1.31%	1.29%	0.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DEXC and DFSV in my portfolio?

DEXC and DFSV have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DEXC or DFSV?

DEXC has higher volatility (10.08%) compared to DFSV (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEXC dropped -18.31% vs DFSV's -28.02%.

Which ETF is better, DEXC or DFSV?

On 1-year performance, DEXC leads with 39.06% vs 37.95% for DFSV. On fees, DFSV is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, DFSV has been the lower-risk option at 3.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DEXC or DFSV?

Over the 1-year period, DEXC has performed better with a 39.06% return vs 37.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DEXC or DFSV?

DFSV is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for DEXC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DEXC or DFSV?

DEXC has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 1.35% for DFSV.

What is the main difference between DEXC and DFSV?

DEXC is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while DFSV is Small Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for DEXC and 0.31% for DFSV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFSV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.