DESK vs. REK

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DESK (Vaneck Office And Commercial REIT ETF) and REK (ProShares Short Real Estate) are both REIT funds - DESK tracks the MarketVector US Listed Office And Commercial REITS Index - Benchmark TR Gross while REK tracks the DJ Global United States (All) / Real Estate -SS (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DESK returned 4.85% vs -4.22% for REK. At a correlation of -0.70, they often move in opposite directions. DESK charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for REK.

Performance

DESK vs. REK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vaneck Office And Commercial REIT ETF (DESK) and ProShares Short Real Estate (REK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DESK achieves a 12.32% return, which is significantly higher than REK's -9.23% return.

DESK

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 8.03%
• YTD: 12.32%
• 6M: 13.23%
• 1Y: 4.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

REK

• 1D: -1.45%
• 1M: -0.67%
• YTD: -9.23%
• 6M: -9.52%
• 1Y: -4.22%
• 3Y*: -5.24%
• 5Y*: -0.65%
• 10Y*: -6.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DESK vs. REK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DESK Vaneck Office And Commercial REIT ETF	12.32%	-10.42%	16.01%	13.17%
REK ProShares Short Real Estate	-9.23%	2.35%	1.42%	-10.15%

Correlation

The correlation between DESK and REK is -0.61, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2023	-0.70

The correlation between DESK and REK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.70 to -0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DESK vs. REK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DESK

DESK Risk / Return Rank: 11
DESK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
DESK Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
DESK Omega Ratio Rank: 11
DESK Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
DESK Martin Ratio Rank: 11

REK

REK Risk / Return Rank: 6
REK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
REK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
REK Omega Ratio Rank: 6
REK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
REK Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DESK vs. REK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vaneck Office And Commercial REIT ETF (DESK) and ProShares Short Real Estate (REK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DESK	REK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.24	-0.30	+0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.47	-0.35	+0.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	0.96	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.19	-0.38	+0.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.41	-0.86	+1.27

DESK vs. REK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DESK Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is higher than the REK Sharpe Ratio of -0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DESK and REK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DESK vs. REK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DESK drawdown since its inception was -28.65%, smaller than the maximum REK drawdown of -84.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DESK and REK.

Drawdown Indicators

	DESK	REK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.65%	-84.57%	+55.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.09%	-11.05%	-14.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.93%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.93%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-58.67%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.06%	-82.46%	+74.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.30%	-64.12%	+52.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.84%	4.94%	+6.90%

Volatility

DESK vs. REK - Volatility Comparison

Vaneck Office And Commercial REIT ETF (DESK) has a higher volatility of 6.75% compared to ProShares Short Real Estate (REK) at 5.22%. This indicates that DESK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DESK	REK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.75%	5.22%	+1.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.44%	10.60%	+4.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.57%	14.14%	+6.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.87%	18.92%	+6.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.87%	20.35%	+5.52%

DESK vs. REK - Expense Ratio Comparison

DESK has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than REK's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

DESK vs. REK - Dividend Comparison

DESK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than REK's 3.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DESK Vaneck Office And Commercial REIT ETF	4.79%	5.15%	3.78%	1.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
REK ProShares Short Real Estate	3.36%	3.43%	6.22%	4.50%	0.48%	0.00%	0.07%	1.28%	0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DESK and REK in my portfolio?

DESK and REK have a correlation of -0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DESK or REK?

DESK has higher volatility (6.75%) compared to REK (5.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DESK dropped -28.65% vs REK's -84.57%.

Which ETF is better, DESK or REK?

On 1-year performance, DESK leads with 4.85% vs -4.22% for REK. On fees, DESK is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, REK has been the lower-risk option at 5.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DESK or REK?

Over the 1-year period, DESK has performed better with a 4.85% return vs -4.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DESK or REK?

DESK is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for REK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DESK or REK?

DESK has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 3.36% for REK.

What is the main difference between DESK and REK?

DESK tracks MarketVector US Listed Office And Commercial REITS Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while REK tracks DJ Global United States (All) / Real Estate -SS (-100%). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DESK and 0.95% for REK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DESK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.24 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.