DESK vs. MOAT
DESK (Vaneck Office And Commercial REIT ETF) and MOAT (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DESK is a REIT fund tracking the MarketVector US Listed Office And Commercial REITS Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while MOAT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DESK returned 4.21% vs 15.51% for MOAT. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DESK charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for MOAT.
Performance
DESK vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DESK achieves a 8.24% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's -0.07% return.
DESK
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- 6.53%
- YTD
- 8.24%
- 6M
- 5.60%
- 1Y
- 4.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MOAT
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 3.57%
- YTD
- -0.07%
- 6M
- -0.05%
- 1Y
- 15.51%
- 3Y*
- 11.79%
- 5Y*
- 8.20%
- 10Y*
- 13.40%
DESK vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DESK Vaneck Office And Commercial REIT ETF | 8.24% | -10.42% | 16.01% | 18.89% |
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | -0.07% | 13.20% | 10.73% | 11.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between DESK and MOAT is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2023 | 0.62 |
The correlation between DESK and MOAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DESK vs. MOAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DESK
MOAT
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
DESK
MOAT
Basic Materials
DESK
-
MOAT
-
Communication Services
DESK
-
MOAT
Consumer Cyclical
DESK
-
MOAT
Consumer Defensive
DESK
-
MOAT
Energy
DESK
-
MOAT
-
Financial Services
DESK
-
MOAT
Healthcare
DESK
-
MOAT
Industrials
DESK
-
MOAT
Technology
DESK
-
MOAT
Utilities
DESK
-
MOAT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DESK vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank
DESK
MOAT
DESK vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vaneck Office And Commercial REIT ETF (DESK) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DESK | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.19 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | 1.25 | -1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.36 | 3.90 | -3.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DESK | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 | 1.12 | -0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.78 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
DESK vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DESK drawdown since its inception was -28.65%, smaller than the maximum MOAT drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DESK and MOAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DESK | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.65% | -33.31% | +4.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.09% | -12.43% | -12.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.40% | -3.88% | -7.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.05% | -3.83% | -7.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.83% | 3.98% | +7.85% |
Volatility
DESK vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison
Vaneck Office And Commercial REIT ETF (DESK) has a higher volatility of 5.86% compared to VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) at 3.86%. This indicates that DESK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DESK | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.86% | 3.86% | +2.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.63% | 9.88% | +4.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.03% | 13.85% | +6.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.70% | 18.18% | +7.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.70% | 18.68% | +7.02% |
DESK vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
DESK has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MOAT's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
DESK vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison
DESK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, more than MOAT's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DESK Vaneck Office And Commercial REIT ETF | 4.97% | 5.15% | 3.78% | 1.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | 1.36% | 1.36% | 1.37% | 0.86% | 1.25% | 1.08% | 1.46% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.07% | 1.17% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DESK and MOAT have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DESK has higher volatility (5.86%) compared to MOAT (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DESK dropped -28.65% vs MOAT's -33.31%.
On 1-year performance, MOAT leads with 15.51% vs 4.21% for DESK. On fees, MOAT is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, MOAT has been the lower-risk option at 3.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MOAT has performed better with a 15.51% return vs 4.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MOAT is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DESK.
DESK has the higher dividend yield at 4.97%, compared with 1.36% for MOAT.
DESK is categorized as REIT, while MOAT is Large Cap Blend Equities. DESK tracks MarketVector US Listed Office And Commercial REITS Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DESK and 0.47% for MOAT.
MOAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DESK and MOAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer